Fair play or foul?

[picXX]

Dont LL's have spiders that are spidering their links and will drop them if there are any HTML changes on the pages?

If they dont, i cant see why everyone is struggeling about the build and forget type of thing,

If they have, i would assume that once you remove one recip for another, you will get dropped at every LL that actually do spider the links.

It must be a whole lot easier just to create new "mirror"sites instead of that risk?

[virgohippy]

Originally Posted by picXX

Dont LL's have spiders that are spidering their links and will drop them if there are any HTML changes on the pages?

I don't think so. I've made mistakes on freesites, and quickly made changes the moment someone pointed them out. (Thank you to all LL owners who actually keep in touch with submitters. )

Originally Posted by picXX

It must be a whole lot easier just to create new "mirror"sites instead of that risk?

I think so. I like to take risks (look at me! I'm a porn-master! ) but I wouldn't take a risk on something with such a permanent consequence.

If I fuck up a page? I don't get listed. If I break a contract? I lose all listing preveleges! The benefit of a bit more traffic on one site just doesn't outweigh the risk, IMO.

[Surfn]

Originally Posted by picXX

Dont LL's have spiders that are spidering their links and will drop them if there are any HTML changes on the pages?

If they dont, i cant see why everyone is struggeling about the build and forget type of thing,

If they have, i would assume that once you remove one recip for another, you will get dropped at every LL that actually do spider the links.

It must be a whole lot easier just to create new "mirror"sites instead of that risk?

My spiders can remove your link from the listings, or they can ban you, or they can reque your link for my hand review (most typical) these are just some of the options I have when I run them.