A question for my fellow lady webmasters.

[susanna]

Originally Posted by karomesis

I stand for absolute freedom for myself and others, it is irrelevant if I like or dislike what they choose to do, what is relevant however, is that it's none of my godamn business.

I have a question for you...those people who say ABSOLUTES like you just did. Is it really appropriate to say every person has absolute freedom? What about the rules of not harming another person (without their consent)? So you are saying a rapist has the individual freedom to rape?

[karomesis]

Susanna, Did you actually read my post?

so long as it harms no one

The condition of freedom was so long as it harmed no one else.

Is it really appropriate to say every person has absolute freedom?

In the future, they will.

[Useless]

Originally Posted by susanna

So you are saying a rapist has the individual freedom to rape?

Don't be a such a sensationalist. You're smarter than that. I have testes and I know that that is not what she meant. Is it really necessary that she lists the things which she wouldn't like absolute freedom for?

1. No freedom to rape.
2. No freedom to dip cats in gasoline and set them ablaze.
3. No more than 10 items in an express lane.

[karomesis]

Is it really necessary that she lists the things which she wouldn't like absolute freedom for?

I think so Useless, from now on, I'll list them in sequential order, from least offensive to most, ending with #3 on your list.The sheer horror of it all, sometimes I wake up in a cold sweat thinking about that lady with 24 items who used change to pay.|shocking|