One step closer to mandatory labeling...

pvtspanky · 2006-06-28, 07:44 PM

Wasn't it just exactly a year ago that the sky started falling again, and nothing changed? One day it's going to land right on my head cuz I won't be paying attention...

plateman · 2006-06-28, 08:47 PM

I think The law will pass, wonder what galleries will have, a waring page before the content is what I would think....

and this law if only for US webmasters would be how effective??

I think the SE's would have to get into it and say we will only index pages with the tags to get the other NON US webmasters to comply, as the US GOV would put pressure on them to only index adult pages with the tags....

maybe something good will come out of this??? like less hobby people, less new commers, and a lot of adult pages dropping off the serps and our pages moving up and in...

virgohippy · 2006-06-29, 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plateman

maybe something good will come out of this??? like less hobby people, less new commers, and a lot of adult pages dropping off the serps and our pages moving up and in...

Amen! Praise

Greenie: your post was quite helpful in keeping the blood pressure nice and level. Good to know someone has the potential to guide this legal issue into a mutually beneficial direction.

Jensen · 2006-06-29, 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plateman

I think the SE's would have to get into it and say we will only index pages with the tags to get the other NON US webmasters to comply, as the US GOV would put pressure on them to only index adult pages with the tags..

so if I should comply with US laws, I suppose you will comply with Norwegian law aswell?

Simon · 2006-06-29, 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jensen

so if I should comply with US laws, I suppose you will comply with Norwegian law aswell?

Depends... you guys got any oil?

Jensen · 2006-06-29, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon

Depends... you guys got any oil?

Norway is the world's second biggest exporter of oil so we got a few barrels left

Bill · 2006-06-28, 09:02 PM

This is a continuation of last year's attack - the same people are testing legal strategies to limit our business, with the goal of appealling to their voters.

This is all part of a combined strategy - the obscenity arrests against extreme content around the country, the recent use of RICO in the fla arrests, linking CP to the adult industry, a number of bills and bill proposals slowly making their way thru committees.

A group of politicians have it in for us, and there is no reason for them to stop trying to find a way to make the news by attacking us.

tickler · 2006-06-30, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill

This is a continuation of last year's attack - the same people are testing legal strategies to limit our business, with the goal of appealling to their voters.

This is all part of a combined strategy - the obscenity arrests against extreme content around the country, the recent use of RICO in the fla arrests, linking CP to the adult industry, a number of bills and bill proposals slowly making their way thru committees.

A group of politicians have it in for us, and there is no reason for them to stop trying to find a way to make the news by attacking us.

Here's a partial list, and the dumbasses behind them.
Congress mulls slew of Net sex rules
- Forcibly blocking off-color Web sites
- Eavesdropping on what Americans are doing online
- Making certain hyperlinks illegal
- Recording which customer is assigned which IP address
- Dispatching "search and destroy" bots
- Restricting naughty Webcams
- Recording e-mail correspondents and Web pages visited
- Taking aim at search engines
- Letting government bureaucrats rate chat rooms
- Permitting the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children to send subpoenas to Internet providers
- Targeting peer-to-peer networks
- Granting Internet censorship power to federal bureaucrats
... and still growing.
http://news.com.com/Congress+mulls+s...27.html?tag=nl

I still like a comment I read somewhere in all this BS. "It should be illegal and require jail time for any politician to create a law that is rejected by the courts."

2006-06-28, 07:44 PM	#1
pvtspanky Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand! Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 93	Wasn't it just exactly a year ago that the sky started falling again, and nothing changed? One day it's going to land right on my head cuz I won't be paying attention... __________________ Promote Classic Porn

2006-06-28, 08:47 PM	#2
plateman What can I do - I was born this way LOL Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: ohio Posts: 3,086	I think The law will pass, wonder what galleries will have, a waring page before the content is what I would think.... and this law if only for US webmasters would be how effective?? I think the SE's would have to get into it and say we will only index pages with the tags to get the other NON US webmasters to comply, as the US GOV would put pressure on them to only index adult pages with the tags.... maybe something good will come out of this??? like less hobby people, less new commers, and a lot of adult pages dropping off the serps and our pages moving up and in... __________________ Submit to: Porn O Plenty XXX Links Reality Here

2006-06-28, 09:02 PM	#7
Bill Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip! Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 3,914	This is a continuation of last year's attack - the same people are testing legal strategies to limit our business, with the goal of appealling to their voters. This is all part of a combined strategy - the obscenity arrests against extreme content around the country, the recent use of RICO in the fla arrests, linking CP to the adult industry, a number of bills and bill proposals slowly making their way thru committees. A group of politicians have it in for us, and there is no reason for them to stop trying to find a way to make the news by attacking us.