ADVISORY TO FREE SPEECH COALITION MEMBERS

[karomesis]

Is it a pain in the ass but so is keeping records for IRS especially knowing that a national sale tax could destroy that agency.

One can only hope.


until that time, there is always consular status.


XXXJay, what significance do you see this precedent setting?

Or was it a premonition to those who participate in FSC?

[xxxjay]

Originally Posted by karomesis

One can only hope.


until that time, there is always consular status.


XXXJay, what significance do you see this precedent setting?

Or was it a premonition to those who participate in FSC?

Its not likely they will fuck with secondarys yet...not with the origanal version in court. It's mostly a primary's problem for the short run.

[RedCherry]

XXX Jay, given this article http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=16215 which states in part

Free Speech Coalition attorney Jeffrey Douglas, who said that the law mandates that so-called secondary producers — a group that likely includes adult webmasters — will be required to comply with 2257.

In addition to expanding liability to secondary producers, the proposed law also mandates record-keeping for films and images containing depictions of “lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.”

According to Douglas, that means that exhibitions of mere nudity could fall under the 2257 record-keeping regime.

Does it sound like we can still just hand them a form that we are secondary producers only?