|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
There's Xanax in my thurible!
|
First of all, I agree with Walrus' idea on the cat specific linking. So if the free-site is Asian based, link to an Asian post without calling it a blog. That's a great idea!
Quote:
The more important question is what will I gain from these hardlink -- read non-organic links-- trades.... that's the tough one. It is my theory that based on current se algorithms and reported reciprical trade penalties, I don't think 'hardlink trades' can be looked at as search engine boosters any longer. I would look at the traffic of the place you plan on linking to and treat it as a traffic trade. The unfortunate thing about this is that it makes submitting to more high trafficed blog listing sites more valuable then merely a link trade with a partner blog. I say that is unfortunate, because I would much rather link to a fellow blogger then to blog hub/index/link dump etc... Mind you that's not going to stop me from linking to my fellow bloggers, and this of course is just a theory. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
|
Quote:
I personally think the problem she is having is that it is scheduled and not random. In other words, Google is able to see a pattern to it and if nothing else begins to wonder about it. But then again, thats just my opinion and we all know how much opinions are worth!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
on vacation
|
Quote:
Since I'm so 'SE challenged' lol, I generally look at link trades as traffic trades anyway. I didn't want a whole bunch of directory listings, I'd rather have the blog links too. I always check out the other blogs when I'm surfing a blog just to see if there's anything interesting, and I rarely surf blog directories, so in my mind, blog links are more valuable. Walrus - I've been following that pingback thread and I must admit, it's pretty confusing to me ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
|
Quote:
![]() I'll spend some time thinking about a good explaination of them today. Seems there is enough confusion I could add it to my tools site. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
on vacation
|
but I have yours listed...you're special
![]() actually, my point was for the tons of them that have seemed to spring out of nowhere...everyone's jumping on the bandwagon I guess. Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
|
Hmmm they told me that when I went to school too! Put me in special classes....gave me a special education...so I do feel honored.
I've been roped into doing a feedburner thing too so I'll post both of them on the tools site in the next couple days. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
|
From looking at how Google parses pages for snippets, I've noticed it does its best to ignore HREFs (i.e. blog rolls, nav links) that aren't embedded in unlinked text on the first pass. This behavior is probably completely unrelated to indexing pages, but its my way of saying that like Walrus pointed out, I believe blog posts that link to you are way more powerful than reciprocals links sitting lifelessly on blogrolls.
Aaron Wall recently laid out a few criterias for reciprocal links: relevance, traffic, and audience demographic, saying (I'm paraphrasing here) "link as if search engines didn't exist. Link for your surfers." Something like that. Don't get me wrong. I'm not endorsing what he wrote, but if you want some food for thought, check out 101 ways to build link popularity in 2006. I know adult sites are a different cup of tea than mainstream sites, but there might be a few good reminders on the list for bloggers.
__________________
Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiasm. Last edited by Halfdeck; 2006-08-17 at 01:38 AM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|