ATTN: Webmasters submitting to the hoes.com gay category

Bill · 2006-11-17, 05:36 AM

Well, marc, I don't know if everyone would agree that hoes has that reputation, but it has come up in conversations I've had with people.

On the other hand, when you do list a site the listing is a good one, that lasts.

My own experience, before I stopped subbing after the 'click here' stuff, is probably pretty typical. Pretty much every linklist I submit to lists every one of my sites, all of the time. When they don't accept the site, it's for a good understandable reason.

But hoes reviewers were only accepting about 6 out of 10, on average. Why they accepted one and not another, I had no clue. I did various tests to try to figure out why the acceptance ratio at hoes was so bad - sometimes a site I thought was very agressive would be accepted, sometimes a really clean site would be rejected.

I've discussed with people, over the years, the various reasons why sites might not get accepted at hoes - Is the use of a hub or small linklist link as the 3rd link out the problem? Does hoes have a harder content policy? Is there some word or another that hoes reviewers don't like?

What can I say - same site, everyone else accepts it every single time, but hoes reviewers don't. That makes you more strict. ;-}

plateman · 2006-11-17, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill

What can I say - same site, everyone else accepts it every single time, but hoes reviewers don't. That makes you more strict. ;-}

Yup I quit submitting a long time ago to hoes, had problems getting sites listed and posted the last one submitted and mezzanine said there's no reason why it didnt get listed, and was told to resub it, and I did and it still didnt get listed - so I just quit

most reviewers know my sites and I put a lot of time in them and make things very clear to the surfer and almost always use the .com in my text and never try and trick surfers into thinking there getting something for free and the tour

Preacher · 2006-11-17, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plateman

Yup I quit submitting a long time ago to hoes, had problems getting sites listed...

Ditto, yet I have no problems getting listed elsewhere. |goodnight

Licker4U · 2006-11-17, 11:43 AM

Im not sure what's wrong with my sites at HOES. I have 20 sites listed out of 42 submitted. There are probably a few still in the queue yet to be reviewed. I have their recip with LOR, Adult List, Smut Gremlins, Rechard's Realm, Penis Bot, Wet Place and Mike's Free Porn. I consistently get listed at LOR, Adult List, Smut Gremlins, Richard's Realm and Mikes Free Porn. (Penis Bot and Wet Place were recently added so I'm sure most are in their respective queue's) So yeah, I would say HOES is strict.

msanchez · 2006-11-17, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Yup I quit submitting a long time ago to hoes, had problems getting sites listed and posted the last one submitted and mezzanine said there's no reason why it didnt get listed, and was told to resub it, and I did and it still didnt get listed - so I just quit

Seems about the same as my experiences.

2006-11-17, 05:36 AM	#1
Bill Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip! Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 3,914	Well, marc, I don't know if everyone would agree that hoes has that reputation, but it has come up in conversations I've had with people. On the other hand, when you do list a site the listing is a good one, that lasts. My own experience, before I stopped subbing after the 'click here' stuff, is probably pretty typical. Pretty much every linklist I submit to lists every one of my sites, all of the time. When they don't accept the site, it's for a good understandable reason. But hoes reviewers were only accepting about 6 out of 10, on average. Why they accepted one and not another, I had no clue. I did various tests to try to figure out why the acceptance ratio at hoes was so bad - sometimes a site I thought was very agressive would be accepted, sometimes a really clean site would be rejected. I've discussed with people, over the years, the various reasons why sites might not get accepted at hoes - Is the use of a hub or small linklist link as the 3rd link out the problem? Does hoes have a harder content policy? Is there some word or another that hoes reviewers don't like? What can I say - same site, everyone else accepts it every single time, but hoes reviewers don't. That makes you more strict. ;-}

2006-11-17, 11:43 AM	#4
Licker4U Mean people suck, nice people swallow, are you mean or nice? Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Lower Alabama-The Redneck Riviera Posts: 2,377	Im not sure what's wrong with my sites at HOES. I have 20 sites listed out of 42 submitted. There are probably a few still in the queue yet to be reviewed. I have their recip with LOR, Adult List, Smut Gremlins, Rechard's Realm, Penis Bot, Wet Place and Mike's Free Porn. I consistently get listed at LOR, Adult List, Smut Gremlins, Richard's Realm and Mikes Free Porn. (Penis Bot and Wet Place were recently added so I'm sure most are in their respective queue's) So yeah, I would say HOES is strict.