Are These New Piece Of Shit Options Now Standard In NATS?

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by jonnydoe

Juggcash is now off my sponsor list...

I pulled them as well, but that was based on the per click & per member totals (which you'll see in the next stats run)

The 24% thing was just a big WTF, but I doubt that extra money would have made a difference in my decision to pull them.

[Linkster]

nibbler - thats the problem is that Nats doesnt allow showing that discounted rate - so your stats show a full membership bought for 29.95 or whatever - and they really only paid 4.95 and that difference is the variation in the processing fee percentages
Of course that said - that also makes you rely on the sponsor to be open about really happening (your trust of them) and that they dont use that as a method of "keeping a little extra for themselves" - its a big hole in the reporting in Nats as far as Im concerned

[plateman]

for a long time now, my thinking of having sponsors on my LL to give more and new choices for the surfers, is over, now my new model is to have sponsors who have good surport for me and will bend over backwards to help me and offer a good product for the surfers

sponsors that show only 2nd and 3rd uniques, have shit promo tools, or a attuide of they are better at what they think we should have from them, is a crap way of thinking, or programs that show a sale then wait days for the money to show in your stats after fraud checks

lets face it there are way to many good programs out there that always have new sites and promo tools coming out and seem to track uniques decent, plus have nice bonus days....

some of these older or fucked way of doing stuff programs out there, I am just gonna delete them from my sites, even if I been wating for that 1 more sale to get a check

also programs who had mpa stats and went to nats, I've made less in sales after the switch

[nibbler]

Originally Posted by Linkster

nibbler - thats the problem is that Nats doesnt allow showing that discounted rate - so your stats show a full membership bought for 29.95 or whatever - and they really only paid 4.95 and that difference is the variation in the processing fee percentages
Of course that said - that also makes you rely on the sponsor to be open about really happening (your trust of them) and that they dont use that as a method of "keeping a little extra for themselves" - its a big hole in the reporting in Nats as far as Im concerned

Linkster - I misspoke in my previous post. I said I had a recur at $24.95. I meant I had a rebill at $24.95, but I definitely hear what you're saying

[PBucksJohn]

Originally Posted by Linkster

nibbler - thats the problem is that Nats doesnt allow showing that discounted rate - so your stats show a full membership bought for 29.95 or whatever - and they really only paid 4.95 and that difference is the variation in the processing fee percentages
Of course that said - that also makes you rely on the sponsor to be open about really happening (your trust of them) and that they dont use that as a method of "keeping a little extra for themselves" - its a big hole in the reporting in Nats as far as Im concerned

It is not as much as a hole as one might assume (and rightfully so) because the problem is limited to the stats display. Payouts are still built correctly. You are right tho in that it is a stupid problem to have and it will be fixed soon.

[Linkster]

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn

It is not as much as a hole as one might assume (and rightfully so) because the problem is limited to the stats display. Payouts are still built correctly. You are right tho in that it is a stupid problem to have and it will be fixed soon.

I guess Im an old-fashioned guy that just likes to see accurate numbers then - although I do have a hard time with the fixing soon part as I first reported this to Deecash a year ago and they said they were working with you to fix it - then I reported it again through them in Aug this year and again their response was that they were working with you on it

[PBucksJohn]

Originally Posted by Linkster

I guess Im an old-fashioned guy that just likes to see accurate numbers then - although I do have a hard time with the fixing soon part as I first reported this to Deecash a year ago and they said they were working with you to fix it - then I reported it again through them in Aug this year and again their response was that they were working with you on it

Again, as I said in my first post. You can contact us directly with any concerns you have.