|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Certified Nice Person
|
Then you drop their feed. Done! One can't expect to let a site to run itself and end up with quality. And if one forces an aggregator to look at every post in a heavy database, you must except that the slow down is going to occur.
Last edited by Useless; 2006-12-21 at 08:34 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
![]() After this discussion, I'm thinking: * it makes more and more sense to just keep at 50 items or so per feed at any given time. I think this should be enough to keep visitors busy and should keep your script running not too badly. * Writing your own aggregator is the way to go. Most of the ones I've used were too immature and didn't scale well. Gregarius and Lilina (PHP-based) would both start to choke at around 15,000 feed items (I read a lot of tech blogs). |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|