meta keywords for SEO

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by Halfdeck

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...me&btnG=Search

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...bs&btnG=Search

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache...ient=firefox-a

I'm aching to be convinced otherwise.

---

There's no harm in using the META keywords tag as long as you don't spam the hell out of it. I sometimes use it to help myself remember what I optimized a page for.

Those first two URL's gave me this:

Your search - site:http://www.searchenginelabs.com/ genome - did not match any documents.

Your search - genome inurl:searchenginelabs - did not match any documents.

Spam? No, I was thinking something like this for meta keywords:

<META name="keywords" CONTENT="huge massive cocks fucking pussy">

It's basically a sentence but each word stands alone as a relevant word for a "big cock" site.

And for meta description:

<META name="description" CONTENT="images and movies of huge massive cocks fucking pussy">

[Bill]

That's Halfdecks point, Licker4u, the searches show no results for a page that he's saying is cached for a meta keywords test.

What led you to decide to use spaces instead of commas?

I said earlier there's a lot of ongoing debate about the keywords tag. At a certain point you just gotta make your choice and take your chances.

It's a weak tag. I think it barely matters what you put there. And you can do without it on most pages.

However, If you are going to use it, I would say it should be unique for every page you use it on. That's because of the spam detection potential of the meta tags.

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by Bill

That's Halfdecks point, Licker4u, the searches show no results for a page that he's saying is cached for a meta keywords test.

I missed that...

Originally Posted by Bill

What led you to decide to use spaces instead of commas?.

One of the Google articles I read recently said they aren't necessary....I think.