The New 2257 Rulings - What now?

[lassiter]

Originally Posted by Linkster

... although it basically undermined the whole 2257 fight that was going on at the time and what is what the judge in the FSC's case is talking about when he talks about congress redefining the law - no one has filed any sort of case against the Walsh law that Im aware of - and it is way more stringent than the old 2257 changes

Yes, I'm left once more with the strong impression that the FSC is much more interested in protecting the XXX video industry players in the Valley than in protecting the concerns of thousands of scattered webmasters who are affiliates/secondary producers.

And if FSC isn't gonna fight to strike these new Adam Walsh Act provisions down, then the only way they can be removed is if a secondary producer is tried and convicted under 2257, and manages to raise the $$$ to appeal and challenge the law in federal court - a process that usually takes several years.