Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > General Business Knowledge
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

View Poll Results: Do You Support Adult Versions Of YouTube?
Yes, I Support Them 35 24.65%
No, I Do NOT Support Them 77 54.23%
I'm Split 50/50 30 21.13%
Voters: 142. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 2007-04-03, 09:41 PM   #76
Greenguy
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
 
Greenguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo)
Posts: 41,929
Send a message via ICQ to Greenguy
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...Shame on you for using your admin powers to post on the thread who voted how. If the goverment was so willy nilly with their voter information as you are, even less people would come out to vote...
No I didn't. I posted this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie View Post
...Out of the 7 YES votes, 5 are people affiliated with paysites/programs...
This isn't some secret ballot kinda thing & all I did was post what group 5 of the 7 votes (at the time) belonged to.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...Really, my site is a "fake tube" site...
It's still a tube site

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...Just becasue I am not the "Johny Appleseed of free porn" doesn't mean I'm a sad case and besides where would the money for all these people owning linklists and submitting sites come from if it wasn't for us evil "program owners"?...
Who said program owners were evil? My point is that since you joined OC Cash that has appeared to be your #1 priority. I come to this conclusion based on your participation here on the board, which was much greater before OC Cash came into the picture for you. Be honest on this one: If you had to prioritize the hats you wear (and we all have to do this from time to time) what would come 1st? OC or the Link List?

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...Whoops, excuse the fuck out of me. I arrived at my number by taking the total number of free listings (my guess was somewhere around 20,000) and multiplying it by 10 because each site might have that number of pieces of free content. I guess you got me on the photo technicality...
It's not a technicality - you made an uneducated guess & your numbers were way off from the truth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...8400 x 6 = 50400 free movies on LOR divided 316 Free Movies on snizzshare.com = 159 more times free porn online with LOR...
If in the year 2018 if the number of movies on snizzshare is less than 50,400 then you can compare the 2. It's kinda hard to compare an 11 year old site with one that was created 2 weeks ago.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...Is Google bad becasue it killed Excite? Nope, just offered a better product.

Is Myspace bad becasue it killed Friendster? Is Greenguy and Jim bad beause it killed Adultnetsuprise (oh, that was a good one)?...
You can't compare any of those situation to this one because they are the same business model. I can't see where tube sites are the same business model as LL's & TGP's (other than the "free porn" angle & there's a shitload of "free porn" business models)

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...Better yet, is the internet bad becasue it killed magizine sales? I think everyone can agree it's been good for all of us...
You can compare this one. And I ask you this: do you think magazine companies helped/supported/condoned the internet? I'll agree that many adapted by putting their material online, but it's kinda hard to work the material that's in the LL/TGP/FreeSite/Gallery business model into a tube site.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...Right as we piss away on this board there is generations of potential adult customers are turning of age that grew up on Web 2.0 platforms like youtube and myspace. They are not going to crawl their way through link-dumps and warning pages like their parents did. They are going to go with something they know and the more it looks like something they are already familiar with the more they will like the site.

At the end of the day, all you are really rallying against is the design of my site, becasue what I am doing isn't anything we both haven't been doing for years:

Putting free porn online.

Things change fast in this game. You can stand back and be bitter that your business model may be becoming obsolete or you can try to keep up with times. Either way those that stay tied to the tracks of Internet circa 2001 will get run over by a train...

It's called progress!

If you want to call me bitter because it doesn't fit into my business model, then fine. I'm bitter.

In the case of snizzshare, I still find it hard to believe that someone that has a very popular Link List would encourage surfers to go to sites that are not in the same business model.
__________________

Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network
Greenguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-05, 10:58 PM   #77
xxxjay
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
 
xxxjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: atlanta
Posts: 1,787
Send a message via ICQ to xxxjay Send a message via AIM to xxxjay
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie View Post
No I didn't. I posted this:

This isn't some secret ballot kinda thing & all I did was post what group 5 of the 7 votes (at the time) belonged to.
I still think you abused your power a little. Even Jim thought so on the radio show. It's your world, I'm just living in it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie View Post
It's still a tube site
We'll have to agree to disagree then. The way I did it is much more responsible than a real tube site.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie View Post
Who said program owners were evil? My point is that since you joined OC Cash that has appeared to be your #1 priority. I come to this conclusion based on your participation here on the board, which was much greater before OC Cash came into the picture for you. Be honest on this one: If you had to prioritize the hats you wear (and we all have to do this from time to time) what would come 1st? OC or the Link List?
Well OCCash is a lot more hign profile but I have 2 partners, but my personal sites I own outright. I try not to favor either. My participation died off when someone (I wonder who?) made what should have been a private business matter public and I became the board whipping boy (even still to this day).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie View Post
If in the year 2018 if the number of movies on snizzshare is less than 50,400 then you can compare the 2. It's kinda hard to compare an 11 year old site with one that was created 2 weeks ago.
True.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie View Post
You can't compare any of those situation to this one because they are the same business model. I can't see where tube sites are the same business model as LL's & TGP's (other than the "free porn" angle & there's a shitload of "free porn" business models)
Someone else posted "Free porn is free porn is free porn" and I agree with that pretty much.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie View Post
You can compare this one. And I ask you this: do you think magazine companies helped/supported/condoned the internet?
They should have...maybe they'd still be on the racks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie View Post
If you want to call me bitter because it doesn't fit into my business model, then fine. I'm bitter.
I don't see a big difference. A Ford Model-T was a car and so is a Mecedes Benz s550. The Benz is just evelution at work. They are both still cars.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie View Post
In the case of snizzshare, I still find it hard to believe that someone that has a very popular Link List would encourage surfers to go to sites that are not in the same business model.
So you are saying that it is part of our job as linklist owners to keep surfers ignorant or everything beside their linklist?

Don't get me wrong, I love linklists. There is a lot of great things about them. The recip links used to work wonders with the search engines and still do to some degree. The traffic filtering is great. Making the surfers work a little harder to get to the porn is great.

However, ther fact is: Younger surfers are going to gravitate toward Web 2.0 type things that they know and, I fear, over time - linklists will just be the dirty magizine in their dad's closet.

I, myself, would rather ride the crest of a wave than paddle feverishly trying to catch up.
__________________
Circle Of Violence
xxxjay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-05, 11:59 PM   #78
Greenguy
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
 
Greenguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo)
Posts: 41,929
Send a message via ICQ to Greenguy
Jeez you're pokey with your replies

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
I still think you abused your power a little. Even Jim thought so on the radio show. It's your world, I'm just living in it....
There's so much shit in that admin that it boggles my mind. And I often forget that those that do not have admin privileges on a VB board might not know what admins can look at. I assumed that everyone knew we could look at who voted. I'll apologize for that. But like I said, it's not like it's an election - it a poll.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...The way I did it is much more responsible than a real tube site....
My problem is not with irresponsible tube sites, my problem is with ALL tube sites.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...Well OCCash is a lot more hign profile but I have 2 partners, but my personal sites I own outright. I try not to favor either. My participation died off when someone (I wonder who?) made what should have been a private business matter public and I became the board whipping boy (even still to this day)....
You're right, it shouldn't have been brought out in public & we both took a beating on it - my fault.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...Someone else posted "Free porn is free porn is free porn" and I agree with that pretty much....
I still say there's different levels, there's different ways of using it & there's different business models.


Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...They should have...maybe they'd still be on the racks....
So if tube sites continue to grow & Link Lists & TGP's & their submitters encourage people to use them by sending trading traffic & helping people get them off the ground, this is good for Link Lists & TGP's & their submitters? How?

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...I don't see a big difference. A Ford Model-T was a car and so is a Mecedes Benz s550. The Benz is just evelution at work. They are both still cars....
No. This is a Model-T:
http://web.archive.org/web/200203281...xxx-links.com/
This is a Mercedes Benz:
http://www.jays-xxx-links.com/

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...So you are saying that it is part of our job as linklist owners to keep surfers ignorant or everything beside their linklist?...
I'd be happy with keeping their free porn experiences to Link Lists, TGP's, Free Sites & Galleries. I wouldn't link to a Fusker (there is a legit way to do that BTW) I don't promote Guba. I don't promote P2P. I don't link to blogs (but that's mostly because 99.44% of the porn blogs out there are fake) I don't think any of those as well as tube sites are in my best interest as a Link List owner.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
...However, ther fact is: Younger surfers are going to gravitate toward Web 2.0 type things that they know and, I fear, over time - linklists will just be the dirty magizine in their dad's closet.

I, myself, would rather ride the crest of a wave than paddle feverishly trying to catch up.
You know, I had to go look up with Web 2.0 meant

Well, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
__________________

Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network
Greenguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-06, 01:46 AM   #79
xxxjay
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
 
xxxjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: atlanta
Posts: 1,787
Send a message via ICQ to xxxjay Send a message via AIM to xxxjay
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie View Post

You know, I had to go look up with Web 2.0 meant

Well, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
Nice post. Well, it's never to late to teach an old dog new tricks...I'm going next week:

http://www.web2expo.com/

Wanna come with? It should be geek-o-riffic?
__________________
Circle Of Violence
xxxjay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-06, 09:31 AM   #80
Greenguy
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
 
Greenguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo)
Posts: 41,929
Send a message via ICQ to Greenguy
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay View Post
Nice post. Well, it's never to late to teach an old dog new tricks...I'm going next week:

http://www.web2expo.com/

Wanna come with? It should be geek-o-riffic?
I will not be traveling until after the Stanley Cup playoffs are over, as my Sabres will be in the finals this year
__________________

Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network
Greenguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-06, 09:36 AM   #81
spazlabz
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
 
spazlabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bluegrass State
Posts: 963
Send a message via ICQ to spazlabz Send a message via AIM to spazlabz Send a message via Yahoo to spazlabz
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie View Post
I will not be traveling until after the Stanley Cup playoffs are over, as my Sabres will be in the finals this year
good one
look for the lightning to be lifting the cup again this year


spaz
__________________
spazlabz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-07, 03:30 AM   #82
VexXxed
Internet! Is that thing still around?
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1
Wow this is some post!

I have to say, I support "responsible" tube sites.

Allowing user-uploaded & non-2257'd content is not responsible.
__________________
VexXxed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-27, 02:22 PM   #83
LB
I want to set the record straight - I thought the cop was a prostitute
 
LB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 291
Send a message via ICQ to LB
I run wanktube.com and let me make a few comments.....

-It has been up for many months and traffic growth has been ... well amazing. Surfers want community based content on demand sites. Youtube and myspace aren't huge without reason.

-We kill all videos that generate complaints even if we feel they are legit.

-I took on expensive legal advice before starting this site, and we are not breaking any laws.

-Ratios on wanktube have been better than any linklist traffic I have ever had, better than any tgp traffic I have ever had, and I even get better ratios that my ppc traffic.

In a perfect world i would love to see little free content. I would love to go back to the days where we could throw up 20 poor quality free pics and rake in the sales, but unfortunately guys we are in a different era. We either adapt or die.
__________________
IW
skype blance8888
icq 15567120
LB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-29, 07:52 PM   #84
Trixie
Hey, can you take the wheel for a second, I have to scratch my self in two places at once
 
Trixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: near Seattle WA
Posts: 183
Funny, some of these responses.

Anyway, I voted that I'm split on the issue. As a sponsor I obviously am not happy with the idea of buttloads of our video content being "shared" for free and on sites with heavy (and often unscrupulous) advertising or of having to compete with so much free porn, but we've had to resign ourselves to that being the reality and make sure that memberships provide content that surfers canNOT get for free (live cams, interaction, easy access to full archives, frequent updates, etc.).

I've no idea why Useless thinks that sponsors don't already find their content used CONSTANTLY on sites with competing advertisements. We do, and we often pay upwards of 50% in sales to affiliates for putting it there (in blogs, review sites, picposts . . . pretty much everywhere unless someone uses our hosted promos).
__________________

A Girl, a Guy, and a Tranny - Unique Indie Porn!
Trixie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-29, 07:58 PM   #85
Trixie
Hey, can you take the wheel for a second, I have to scratch my self in two places at once
 
Trixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: near Seattle WA
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by LB View Post
I run wanktube.com and let me make a few comments.....

-It has been up for many months and traffic growth has been ... well amazing. Surfers want community based content on demand sites. Youtube and myspace aren't huge without reason.

-We kill all videos that generate complaints even if we feel they are legit.

-I took on expensive legal advice before starting this site, and we are not breaking any laws.
Unless I'm the only one who sees NOTHING here, your terms of use don't inspire a lot of confidence:
http://wanktube.com/terms.php
__________________

A Girl, a Guy, and a Tranny - Unique Indie Porn!
Trixie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-29, 09:33 PM   #86
Halfdeck
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
 
Halfdeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 985
Send a message via ICQ to Halfdeck
I haven't read this thread but here are some of my off-the-cuff thoughts on why I'm against this:

1) There will NEVER be an adult version of YouTube. Unless you're talking about your neighbor videotaping himself and his wife go at it and uploading it for the world to see, what we have going on right now is not and never will be an adult version of YouTube.

2) The only site that gains from the traffic is the video hosting site. Submitters send them traffic that will never come back and paysite owners lose sales by helping create a site no one has to pay for.
__________________
Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiasm.
Halfdeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-29, 10:32 PM   #87
Trixie
Hey, can you take the wheel for a second, I have to scratch my self in two places at once
 
Trixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: near Seattle WA
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halfdeck View Post
1) There will NEVER be an adult version of YouTube. Unless you're talking about your neighbor videotaping himself and his wife go at it and uploading it for the world to see, what we have going on right now is not and never will be an adult version of YouTube.
Good point -- there's a big difference between the homemade content users post on youtube and the stolen or promo content posted on pornotube, etc. That doesn't mean it won't catch on, though. I think the new site rude.com encourages non-pro users to do just that: broadcast their own cams and post their own porn videos. Those kinds of sites have done well in the past when they were picture oriented and as long as 2257 doesn't scare everyone away it could happen. It already happens a lot in fetish communities where the fetishists make and share their own porn (there's a doll-sex site and forum like that).
__________________

A Girl, a Guy, and a Tranny - Unique Indie Porn!
Trixie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-30, 11:08 PM   #88
LB
I want to set the record straight - I thought the cop was a prostitute
 
LB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 291
Send a message via ICQ to LB
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trixie View Post
Unless I'm the only one who sees NOTHING here, your terms of use don't inspire a lot of confidence:
http://wanktube.com/terms.php
We are still in beta, but there shouldn't even be a terms page since we haven't passed them by our lawyer yet so thanks for pointing it out
__________________
IW
skype blance8888
icq 15567120
LB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-30, 11:11 PM   #89
LB
I want to set the record straight - I thought the cop was a prostitute
 
LB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 291
Send a message via ICQ to LB
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trixie View Post
Good point -- there's a big difference between the homemade content users post on youtube and the stolen or promo content posted on pornotube, etc. That doesn't mean it won't catch on, though. I think the new site rude.com encourages non-pro users to do just that: broadcast their own cams and post their own porn videos. Those kinds of sites have done well in the past when they were picture oriented and as long as 2257 doesn't scare everyone away it could happen. It already happens a lot in fetish communities where the fetishists make and share their own porn (there's a doll-sex site and forum like that).
What I would love to see is sponsors who aren't ok with the uploading of their promo content on tubes saying so clearly, just like they are starting to do for blogs. However from what I am seeing when I ask sponsors is that most are more than happy for me to use their promo content, and some who realise the quality of the traffic have even put video content packs together for me with no watermarks
__________________
IW
skype blance8888
icq 15567120
LB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-01, 08:32 AM   #90
jayeff
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
 
jayeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 95
Send a message via ICQ to jayeff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trixie View Post
we've had to resign ourselves to that being the reality
The over-riding reality is that the internet is an entirely different marketplace than the bricks-and-mortar world. Some people have exploited those differences almost by accident (solo model site owner/operators) and a handful of others - such as the developers of YouTube and MySpace - have set out to profit from those differences.

The vast majority of us (and I am guilty as charged) depend on business models which fail to recognize these differences at all. That, if you like, is Web 1.0. The Emperor's Clothes are beginning to look decidely translucent, even for the minority who execute their chosen business models well, because supply and demand are closing and because Web 2.0 is moving in. Web 2.0 - in online porn terms - isn't only represented by adult versions of YouTube and MySpace, but also by torrent sites and sites such as "I Shot Myself" and "Suicide Girls".

The internet is about interactivity. Interactivity between individuals and also interactivity between customer and product. If I order books from Amazon, the site will in future suggest books I might enjoy. If I rate movies at Netflix, other movies I might like are displayed. Interactivity on adult sites is largely restricted to dating and webcams, but the success of both those areas should be telling us something.

Another consideration is that there are two fundamental marketing models in any kind of business: low-margin/high-volume and high-margin/low-volume. Ford vs Ferrari. These are not arbitrary choices dictated by producers/sellers (although some, such as champagne producers and diamond merchants, restrict their product to keep prices high). They are also a consequence of market reaction: while some people will buy PC's from independent stores and pay a higher price for the extra service and attention they perceive, most are willing to buy boxes as cheaply as possible.

Online porn, by the very nature of the internet, should be a high-volume/low-margin business. There is a reluctance to accept that, because so many people still influential in the business, have enjoyed unrealistically high margins and obviously do not want to let them go. They are dwindling anyway, the snag is that the customer isn't seeing much benefit because increasing cost-of-sales and static/declining volumes are getting in the way.

Affiliates are paid too much. Never mind newbie webmasters, most of whom begin with no relevant skills whatsoever. We have hundreds of "experienced" webmasters who have no more real skills or business knowledge than the day they started. Sure they learn how to improve their chances of getting a free-site listed in a links list or they buy a script and find out how to avoid the worst pitfalls of traffic trading. But mostly all they bring to the table is labor and labor is a cheap commodity. In a mature market the average affiliate would be damn lucky to make even $20 an hour.

Agree or disagree, what does this have to do with free porn?

In the 90's there were millions of people coming onto the internet, most of whom didn't even have easy, embarassment-free access to anything raunchier than H*stler. For a while at least, there wasn't a lot of free porn available except to the denizens of news groups, and most of what there was, was crap. Surely paysites and AVS programs offered more? They rarely did, but the hope produced a goldrush.

Over the past 10 years we have done an excellent job of educating people that 9 times out of 10, sites will take their money and barely attempt to deliver what was promised, let alone anything substantially better than can be had for free. At the same time, the amount of free content has rocketed and the sites delivering it have become far easier to locate and use. If all you want to do is see pics of naked women or watch a movie of people f*cking, why pay for it is a very valid question.

But we cannot put the lid back on free porn even if we want to. The problem anyway is not free porn per se, but the ridiculous idea that once people have checked to see what all the fuss is about, more than a relatively tiny percentage of the total will be willing to pay $30, $40 and even $50 a month to see more of the same. People will not pay for a Ferrari and be satisfied if they are delivered a Ford.

That message has been delivered loud and clear in every market out there, yet somehow we still ignore it. Essentially we deliver what is cheap and easy for us to deliver and offer it at the prices we want to charge, not the prices that a mature market will bear. We are still, to an extent getting away with it, solely because it might be another 5 years before supply and demand are fully equalized. The fact remains that we are not adding value.

IMO, within 5 years almost all non-interactive porn will be given away and only used to attract traffic. We will see the cost of hiring still photographers and licensing DVD's as no different than other industries view their marketing costs. We shall focus almost entirely on selling interactivity, with just a few specialist sites and those which genuinely deliver ease-of-use and top-quality content, able to charge for anything else.

That interactivity will include live video, but we shall move away from bored models charged at high rates per hour, sitting idle for hours at a time, to something which Mr. Average can afford on a regular basis and we will present it imaginatively enough for him to want to do so. Solo models are also here to stay: not the kind of sites for which someone shot a couple of years' updates in a weekend, but the ones with real interaction between models and visitors. Nor is there any reason that principle needs to be restricted to solo models...

Above all, we will be seeing Web 2.0 sites (btw I hate the term and a lot of it is marketing hype, but it is convenient shorthand) which let surfers interact with each other as well as the content. Adult dating sites will blur into adult community sites, some with a broad appeal and others much more specific. We shall effectively make content sharing legal, because instead of kidding ourselves we can shut it out, we will make it easy for members to share the content we are no longer trying to monetize. That will become just another aspect of interactivity.

The lines will also blur between affiliate sites and sponsor sites because with both heading towards the community model and both giving a lot away, outwardly they will look very similar. That is also what will effectively raise the entry bar for new webmasters. It never can cost more than the price of a PC and an internet connection to want to be an adult webmaster, but the knowledge and investment needed to build sites with the potential to earn serious money in future, will increase dramatically.

At the risk of getting even further off topic, I think we shall see other changes in the sponsor-affiliate relationship. Payments will more often become related to volume but also there will be more discrimination. The shotgun approach to attracting affiliates is increasingly expensive and less productive and even though many affiliates earn little or nothing for the majority of sponsors, their existence makes life more difficult for productive affiliates. So just as in other industries, we are going to see the top names becoming much more selective about their affiliates, both to reduce recruitment costs and to encourage those who can generate volume to join them on the promise of less competition. New webmasters will have to settle for new or otherwise struggling programs. More of the money now being spent on newbie recruitment, shows, etc., is going to go instead on affiliate development and practical support, because sponsors need to start taking control of their businesses, instead of merely hoping that a high profile will produce results.

I haven't looked at the poll, but I would guess that 80%+ are opposed to adult versions of YouTube. If you want to be making money 5-10 years from now, instead of opposing YouTube, you should be embracing it and whatever is going to be coming next. The Web 2.0 developments of the past few years are just the beginning...
jayeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-01, 12:47 PM   #91
JaceXXX
A woman is like beer. They look good, they smell good, and you'd step over your own mother just to get one!
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 55
check out my new system

I make my blog post like this
http://www.adailyfix.com/index.php/2...-the-foursome/

then instead of embedding a movie into the blog post, I started a tube site that I upload movie to, so you see an image like this


you click it and get taken to my tube site
http://www.previewtheporn.com/view_v...5687be6106a3b8

so, basically I am getting my blog rolling, but also getting some traffic to the tube site....I am not allowing registration or any features to surfers, just view the video and that is it...and I am the only one that can upload videos

is this an approved way of doing things?

btw, the tube site is not completely done yet, i still gotta get it designed and themed and shit
__________________
That Blog Guy
JaceXXX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-01, 01:04 PM   #92
LB
I want to set the record straight - I thought the cop was a prostitute
 
LB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 291
Send a message via ICQ to LB
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayeff View Post
Affiliates are paid too much.
I don't mean to diminish your post, but i agree with this.

I do a lot of mainstream work and I am paid a fraction of what I am paid in adult.

However the payouts to affiliates will only tone down once we manage to cut affiliates out of the business. This is a process which has already been started and the people who insert themselves between traffic sources and sponsors are becoming fewer and fewer.
__________________
IW
skype blance8888
icq 15567120
LB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-01, 01:24 PM   #93
Allfetish
If you really need money, you can sell your kidney or even your car
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
Quote:
Originally Posted by LB View Post
I don't mean to diminish your post, but i agree with this.

I do a lot of mainstream work and I am paid a fraction of what I am paid in adult.

However the payouts to affiliates will only tone down once we manage to cut affiliates out of the business. This is a process which has already been started and the people who insert themselves between traffic sources and sponsors are becoming fewer and fewer.
I like to keep note of who wants to cut me out of their business. Then I make sure to give them their wish. I think more affiliates should consider doing this.
Allfetish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-01, 07:44 PM   #94
jayeff
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
 
jayeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 95
Send a message via ICQ to jayeff
Quote:
Originally Posted by LB View Post
However the payouts to affiliates will only tone down once we manage to cut affiliates out of the business.
I have no doubt that is the direction many will take and among the first will doubtless be many of the very same people who were falling over themselves to raise affiliate payments just a few years ago. Unfortunately, they still haven't learned the right lessons and cutting out affiliates is going to prove as short-sighted as everything else so far.
jayeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-01, 10:27 PM   #95
Greenguy
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
 
Greenguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo)
Posts: 41,929
Send a message via ICQ to Greenguy
jayeff - I read your book...twice. Aside from my feeling that you could have made the same post 5 years ago, what'd you vote for in the poll?
__________________

Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network
Greenguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-02, 07:05 AM   #96
jayeff
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
 
jayeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 95
Send a message via ICQ to jayeff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie View Post
jayeff - I read your book...twice. Aside from my feeling that you could have made the same post 5 years ago, what'd you vote for in the poll?
I didn't vote, for the same reason that although I couldn't have written that post 5 years ago, I could have predicted then that I would be writing it now.

Every developing industry goes through the same phases. Those phases vary in length from one industry to the next and the signs saying hey, this is where we are now, are also different. But the direction and destination is ultimately the same. Market forces are implacable. That reality is what makes possible the study of subjects such as economics and business management. It's why accountants and stock analysts are able to determine the health of individual businesses.

That may seem like an abstract consideration, but it isn't. It really doesn't matter where a train is when you get on it, nor which stations it will pass through en route. But to be wearing the right clothes when it reaches its destination, you need to know whether it is going to Florida or Alaska.

There are lots of ways to make money and those with a talent for spotting bandwagons early and knowing when to jump off, can do very nicely by constantly operating short-term, as it were. But the internet is already demonstrating that as always, the really serious money is earned by those who anticipate future bandwagons. No-one could have forecast specifically that there would be a YouTube or a MySpace, but the nature of the internet in particular and business/marketing in general, dictated that there had to be something like them.

Whether we welcome them or oppose them is irrelevant. They simply are.
jayeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-02, 12:30 PM   #97
Mister E
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15
Great question my friend but THEY would NOT exist if we didn't have the balls to be like Sinatra and do it our way. We did an it worked! Hell, Toyota sold more cars than GM last quarter because they refined their product. Fair competition is a good thing and though I c the point, to oppose anything on the web (save the obvious kid stuff which is as evil as brown corduroy) opposing any competition may inspire others to oppose US. And, Oh ya', keep in mind...we are really good @ what we do.
__________________
elliot
elliot@guerillatraffic.com
ICQ 382987380
www.guerillatraffic.com
Mister E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-02, 12:31 PM   #98
Mister E
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15
Whoever u r, I like your argument!
__________________
elliot
elliot@guerillatraffic.com
ICQ 382987380
www.guerillatraffic.com
Mister E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-03, 06:03 AM   #99
LB
I want to set the record straight - I thought the cop was a prostitute
 
LB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 291
Send a message via ICQ to LB
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayeff View Post
I have no doubt that is the direction many will take and among the first will doubtless be many of the very same people who were falling over themselves to raise affiliate payments just a few years ago. Unfortunately, they still haven't learned the right lessons and cutting out affiliates is going to prove as short-sighted as everything else so far.
Some of the best paysites I have seen, with concepts that I know make them amazing sales either point blank refuse to take on affiliates, or only take them on after they have enjoyed a long period of exclusive promotion.

I didn't put my point very well before and it came off a little wrong. What I am suggesting is that the middle man is being cut out. Its the site owners with their traffic who are increasingly going straight to the sponsor, giving less traffic out to others for free, or asking submitters to start paying for a piece of the pie.

Anyhow I am straying off topic ... sorry
__________________
IW
skype blance8888
icq 15567120
LB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-03, 09:29 AM   #100
Bobc01
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hell
Posts: 817
I think the threat is that most content you see on a paysite you can find free around the net anyway because 90% of it is plugged in.

Pick out any themed paysite and it will be exactly the same as any other only it will look different.

To compete with free porn offer something more unique that people can't get for free.
Bobc01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:31 PM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc