What Pisses You Off With Link Lists & Free Sites?

ponygirl · 2007-08-18, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maj. Stress

24 hour limit on submits. I hate em. Why not 23 for those of us that have (or had) a regular routine. As it is now I just take a day a week off from subimtting and just submit whenever.

oh, that's a good one. I never used to find myself being able to submit every day but lately I've streamlined things to the point where it doesn't seem impossible

2 subs/day or maybe a preferred submitter list who can sub 2x/day would be cool too.

kane · 2007-08-18, 09:47 PM

I have a few.

First, LL sites that don't understand the content. I have made non-nude/tease types of sites and been rejected for not showing enough nudity. Teasing and not showing nudity the point of the whole site. I have also made voyeur and amateur sites where to quality of the pics/movies wasn't top notch and have gotten rejected for low quality content. The point of many voyeur and amateur sites is that they are supposed to be lower quality to reflect the real/taboo nature of the niche.

Second, like someone else said, the 24 hour rule. I understand it it fully, LL's don't want to get flooded, but what ends up happening is that on Monday I start my submissions at 1pm, I have to wait until 2pm on tues then 3pm on wed and by Friday or Saturday it is 5 or 6pm when I'm submitting and at that hour I should be drinking beer somewhere

. 22 or 23 hours would let me start my submits at 1pm and finish them by 2pm then I could do them at the same time the next day.

Those are my only real complaints. Otherwise I am cool.

Lemmy · 2007-08-18, 11:22 PM

It seems to me that the whole LL/freesite model is drifting towards providing the surfer with more and more free porn of better and better quality that is becoming easier and easier to find.

The definition of a freesite is becoming narrower, the list of don'ts is getting longer. For the WM interested in making the most of it, it is becoming harder to make unique designs each and every day. I haven't received a template rejection...yet.

How 'bout loosening up a little on site structure and content requirements? What's wrong with a linear site? What's the harm in a few "semi-blind" links as long as you're not downright tricking the surfer? What about a benign console? Pics on html pages with banners?

It's been said more times then I care to remember on this board that we should tease the surfer just enough to take out the plastic, not enough to get him off. Just recently I was rejected because I didn't have 5 movies on each page (which was fair enough because it was right there in the rules). But still it's ridiculous. 10 movies to a freesite, 1000s of freesites listed. Small wonder conversions are dropping.

The way things are progressing we might as well soon visit the surfers at home and jerk them off ourselves.

Oh yeah, I too hate hardcore party sites, impossible-to-read image verifications and people who don't send rejection e-mails.

2007-08-18, 09:47 PM	#2
kane A woman is like beer. They look good, they smell good, and you'd step over your own mother just to get one! Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Portland, OR Posts: 56	I have a few. First, LL sites that don't understand the content. I have made non-nude/tease types of sites and been rejected for not showing enough nudity. Teasing and not showing nudity the point of the whole site. I have also made voyeur and amateur sites where to quality of the pics/movies wasn't top notch and have gotten rejected for low quality content. The point of many voyeur and amateur sites is that they are supposed to be lower quality to reflect the real/taboo nature of the niche. Second, like someone else said, the 24 hour rule. I understand it it fully, LL's don't want to get flooded, but what ends up happening is that on Monday I start my submissions at 1pm, I have to wait until 2pm on tues then 3pm on wed and by Friday or Saturday it is 5 or 6pm when I'm submitting and at that hour I should be drinking beer somewhere . 22 or 23 hours would let me start my submits at 1pm and finish them by 2pm then I could do them at the same time the next day. Those are my only real complaints. Otherwise I am cool. __________________ Please Re-Read The Rules For Sig Files

2007-08-18, 11:22 PM	#3
Lemmy You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Next door to a kid with a moped. Posts: 1,492	It seems to me that the whole LL/freesite model is drifting towards providing the surfer with more and more free porn of better and better quality that is becoming easier and easier to find. The definition of a freesite is becoming narrower, the list of don'ts is getting longer. For the WM interested in making the most of it, it is becoming harder to make unique designs each and every day. I haven't received a template rejection...yet. How 'bout loosening up a little on site structure and content requirements? What's wrong with a linear site? What's the harm in a few "semi-blind" links as long as you're not downright tricking the surfer? What about a benign console? Pics on html pages with banners? It's been said more times then I care to remember on this board that we should tease the surfer just enough to take out the plastic, not enough to get him off. Just recently I was rejected because I didn't have 5 movies on each page (which was fair enough because it was right there in the rules). But still it's ridiculous. 10 movies to a freesite, 1000s of freesites listed. Small wonder conversions are dropping. The way things are progressing we might as well soon visit the surfers at home and jerk them off ourselves. Oh yeah, I too hate hardcore party sites, impossible-to-read image verifications and people who don't send rejection e-mails. __________________ BUY MY PORNSITES!