|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
You can't disprove anything with evidence that doesn't exist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NW Minnesota - pop 865 +/- 1
Posts: 2,038
|
Just remove the "C" and you have it - BS!!
I don't give a crap about strength of schedule, if you're undefeated, you should deserve a shot at the title. If you get spanked, oh well, you earned to get there. I agree with Ramster, a 4 team from the bowl games playoff.
__________________
This is me Mark's-Links |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
|
That would be the biggest BS ever!!!! So, the SEC would continue to play tough teams (which is required) and places like Hawaii can play daycare centers and they should hit the championship game every year??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Mean people suck, nice people swallow, are you mean or nice?
|
Quote:
They are undefeated but they didn't play anyone of substance. They are one of the two best teams in the country? They should play for the national championship? I think not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Lonewolf Internet Sales
|
Quote:
Georgia on the other hand has defeated 4 ranked teams, three of those on the road. We'll find out on January 1 if Hawaii really belongs in a BCS bowl game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Mean people suck, nice people swallow, are you mean or nice?
|
Quote:
Hmmm, I just noticed something. Ohio State didn't beat a single team that was ranked in the top 20 at the time they played. |shocking| Strength of schedule should be put back into the BCS computer program. Teams playing most or all of their games against "homecoming" type teams should have that taken into account as well as those defeating top ranked teams. I vote for a playoff but as one sports writer said, the regular season would become less important … fans would have difficulty traveling from playoff site to playoff site … regular-season attendance might suffer … the bowls might be adversely affected. Oh damn.... Last edited by Licker4U; 2007-12-03 at 10:38 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Lonewolf Internet Sales
|
Quote:
I guess we now have the answer to that question. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|