The Official Link O'Rama Rejection Thread II

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by Foxxy

Actually, I think that contributes to the absurd factor. I read your rules page. Since you brought it up, I read it a second time. It seems like I am within the rules listed, unless there are hidden rules not covered by that page...

Did you read the 1st rule?
1. I only list Free Sites (warning page leads to main page leads to gallery pages) No galleries, no pay sites, no avs sites.
The part on BOLD is what I am referring to. The site you submitted:
http://www.foxxytheater.com/free_por...cial_fuck.html
is not what my (and most other) Link Lists consider a "free site" to be.

Let me ask you this: did you even bother to look at some of the free sites that I have listed?

Originally Posted by horney

Hi, there,

No error message to say otherwise so I assume your submission script is now finding http://www.pussyfuckstories.com/ftv-violet1/index.html but it says there's no link there. It's a straight copy and paste from your approved links, and it works when I click on it.

The recips table looks a lot better in IE6&7 now - haven't tested it in IE5 - although in a couple of them the text is spreading for a reason I haven't yet fathomed. I'll keep working at it.

So, out of at least ten attempts, your script has worked once so far, on about the fourth attempt when I first submitted. It may be the transatlantic cable, which I have always found to be flaky. Does anyone else experience the same amount of false errors?

I show that was submitted at 16:11:34 on 8 Jan 2008 & rejected at 07:12:53 on 9 Jan 2008 (EST) I think it was because of the Site Title that you submitted: ftv-violet1 (I assume that the site title is actually: Violet Experiments with Vegetables and Water)

As far as the submit problems & the recip code, I looked at the coding you have on the page & it is very different from the coding I have on my recip page (I don't use the style or word-spacing tags)

[Foxxy]

Originally Posted by Greenie

Let me ask you this: did you even bother to look at some of the free sites that I have listed?

Of course. Mostly out of being curious about how people are monetizing their sites and what kind of layouts they are using. I only went to 4 though because I couldn't handle much more of the green on black. I totally get why you like the color combination, but it just doesn't agree with my eyes.

It sounds like you're mostly just wanting me to put you on the main warning page for the entire site. I guess that's my loss, because I like that page to look neat and tidy, and won't clutter it up.

Maybe one day I'll create a junk site with 2 photo sets like everyone else does, but that's just too much bother for one link. I'd rather focus more on giving more content to the people who are coming in.

Thanks anyway.

[RageCash-Ben]

Originally Posted by Foxxy

Of course. Mostly out of being curious about how people are monetizing their sites and what kind of layouts they are using. I only went to 4 though because I couldn't handle much more of the green on black. I totally get why you like the color combination, but it just doesn't agree with my eyes.

It sounds like you're mostly just wanting me to put you on the main warning page for the entire site. I guess that's my loss, because I like that page to look neat and tidy, and won't clutter it up.

Maybe one day I'll create a junk site with 2 photo sets like everyone else does, but that's just too much bother for one link. I'd rather focus more on giving more content to the people who are coming in.

Thanks anyway.

lol at this post