2257 Ruled Unconstitutional

[papagmp]

Originally Posted by tickler

Interesting that the reason the one judge dissented, was because he figured that 2257 could work if they removed the seconday producer stuff, and also changed the language to apply to commercial production only.

I caught that too - interesting that he assumed that the "commercial producer" is more likely to produce illegal content - LOL

[Toby]

Originally Posted by papagmp

I caught that too - interesting that he assumed that the "commercial producer" is more likely to produce illegal content - LOL

That's not it at all. Regulation of non-commercial production, i.e. a couple video taping themselves for their own personal enjoyment, is a pretty clear violation of free speech.