New free site format (version 1.5)

bluebrit · 2008-04-01, 10:14 AM

This threads all well and good but so far i still haven't seen anything that's going to make a great deal of difference.

40 recips is great to stop mirrors but mirrors will still be built by people submitting to 80 LL so that achieves nothing but it does turn the warning page into a banner farm without images. More outbound links than inbound are a reason a lot of sites don't list high in google in the first place so forty static links would be like waving a red flag at them.

If i am right in my thinking, (and there are people on the board more qualified in seo than myself) search engines do not like listing fs because the fs model never updates.
On top of that the format is easy for se algorithms the likes of google's to spot so if it is listed, the listing is temporary at best unless it has something very unusual to offer.

Search engines, now more than ever, are where sales come from and they are looking for quality active sites that update regularly and offer the surfer something new.

That's something a fs will never do. fs are basically a static advert saying take a look and buy more porn. What good is that to google?

Assuming i am right. Changing the pages or the recips, is not going to make a fs anywhere near as interesting to se's as daily updated blogs or LL and that being the case, the changes mentioned may work short term but in the long run, they will make no difference at all.

Personally i am leaning towards the idea of a few different formats that stay within the standard rules but give more flexibility to the submitters so they can build using different formats.

That may mean more work short term for reviewers but 3 or 4 acceptable models will probably stand a better chance of good se listings than the single one we are all using now.

I would like to hear from someone with good seo knowledge, what they think of this problem. Any takers?

Useless · 2008-04-01, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluebrit

I would like to hear from someone with good seo knowledge, what they think of this problem. Any takers?

You already have.

borgivan · 2008-04-01, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluebrit

...what they think of this problem...

When Kit will present his view on dynamic FS, that he called FS 2.0 in another thread, your brain will be fucken cracked off

But LL that will use this technic will raise up, I think...

2008-04-01, 10:14 AM	#1
bluebrit Along for the ride and loving it. Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 1,873	This threads all well and good but so far i still haven't seen anything that's going to make a great deal of difference. 40 recips is great to stop mirrors but mirrors will still be built by people submitting to 80 LL so that achieves nothing but it does turn the warning page into a banner farm without images. More outbound links than inbound are a reason a lot of sites don't list high in google in the first place so forty static links would be like waving a red flag at them. If i am right in my thinking, (and there are people on the board more qualified in seo than myself) search engines do not like listing fs because the fs model never updates. On top of that the format is easy for se algorithms the likes of google's to spot so if it is listed, the listing is temporary at best unless it has something very unusual to offer. Search engines, now more than ever, are where sales come from and they are looking for quality active sites that update regularly and offer the surfer something new. That's something a fs will never do. fs are basically a static advert saying take a look and buy more porn. What good is that to google? Assuming i am right. Changing the pages or the recips, is not going to make a fs anywhere near as interesting to se's as daily updated blogs or LL and that being the case, the changes mentioned may work short term but in the long run, they will make no difference at all. Personally i am leaning towards the idea of a few different formats that stay within the standard rules but give more flexibility to the submitters so they can build using different formats. That may mean more work short term for reviewers but 3 or 4 acceptable models will probably stand a better chance of good se listings than the single one we are all using now. I would like to hear from someone with good seo knowledge, what they think of this problem. Any takers?