Opinions of listing sites with no meta, alt, or title tags?

Cleo · 2008-07-02, 02:20 PM

I'm referring to the title text on links, not the page title.

stuveltje · 2008-07-02, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cleo

I'm referring to the title text on links, not the page title.

ah oke i am sorry, my bad, well i dont think that is a problem for a linksite owner, i have never heard some ll owner before about the tags things on links, i know ll owners have problems with keywords and title things in their html and the description of the free site (which will be on all the lls they submit too) what is very bad for ses (because of some ses will see as duplicate stuf), btw i have never use title things on links when i made free sites(i found it to much work), well i dont think thats any problem for a linksite owner and you shouldnt worrie about it.

Useless · 2008-07-02, 02:46 PM

I suppose it's going to depend on one's view of link lists and free sites, as in, are they completely separate entities, or does one take into consideration the inherent relationship of the two? I assume that many free site submitters see link lists as free traffic while not understanding that their accepted sites become part of the reason as to why the link lists have traffic to give in the first place.

Obviously, Google doesn't rank a free site based on strict HTML composed of numbered, untagged images and untitled links. (Who the hell wants to rank well for "36.jpg"? - though I do grasp the efficiency in numbered images.) The title tag places a keyword value on the page being linked to, much like the name of the page itself. Submitters should realize that it's better for themselves, as well as the link lists which they submit to, to make proper use of meta, title, and alt tags. It's truly mutually beneficial.

I don't really have an opinion on whether or not they should be required, nor do I have a right to such an opinion, since my reviewing has been very, very sporadic lately. The sun has been shining.

2008-07-02, 02:20 PM	#1
Cleo Subversive filth of the hedonistic decadent West Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Southeast Florida Posts: 27,936	I'm referring to the title text on links, not the page title. __________________ Free Rides on Uber and Lyft Uber Car: uberTzTerri Lyft Car: TZ896289

2008-07-02, 02:46 PM	#3
Useless Certified Nice Person Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Dirty Undies, NY Posts: 11,268	I suppose it's going to depend on one's view of link lists and free sites, as in, are they completely separate entities, or does one take into consideration the inherent relationship of the two? I assume that many free site submitters see link lists as free traffic while not understanding that their accepted sites become part of the reason as to why the link lists have traffic to give in the first place. Obviously, Google doesn't rank a free site based on strict HTML composed of numbered, untagged images and untitled links. (Who the hell wants to rank well for "36.jpg"? - though I do grasp the efficiency in numbered images.) The title tag places a keyword value on the page being linked to, much like the name of the page itself. Submitters should realize that it's better for themselves, as well as the link lists which they submit to, to make proper use of meta, title, and alt tags. It's truly mutually beneficial. I don't really have an opinion on whether or not they should be required, nor do I have a right to such an opinion, since my reviewing has been very, very sporadic lately. The sun has been shining.