The Official Link O'Rama Rejection Thread II

[SteveHardeman]

Your submission:
Site Name: Broke Amateur Teens
Site URL: http://www.earnthesperm.com/movies/brokeamateurteens/
Category: AmateurMovies

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Other - Please Contact Webmaster

[MrMaryLou]

Originally Posted by SteveHardeman

Your submission:
Site Name: Broke Amateur Teens
Site URL: http://www.earnthesperm.com/movies/brokeamateurteens/
Category: AmateurMovies

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Other - Please Contact Webmaster

You have a PM

[Dollpix]

Your submission:
Site Name: Fucked At Random
Site URL: http://dollpix.com/free1208/index.html
Category: Pornstar

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Site Structure Violation

?? Actually I looked at 3 sites that were listed and based
my structure on those.

Help, please.

[Maya]

Originally Posted by Dollpix

Your submission:
Site Name: Fucked At Random
Site URL: http://dollpix.com/free1208/index.html
Category: Pornstar

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Site Structure Violation

?? Actually I looked at 3 sites that were listed and based
my structure on those.

Help, please.

I must admit I'm a little bit interrested here ...

Which 3 sites have you seen listed on LOR, that has an extra page between the warning and main pages - containing a fullpage ad with a BIG 'enter' link going to the sponsor?

Knowing the rules on LOR, I'd say this breaks quite a few of them.

1 - I only list Free Sites (warning page leads to main page leads to gallery pages)

3 - You must have a clear cut warning page without misleading "enter" links

7 - No Full Page Ads (FPA) of any kind

[Dollpix]

http://www.vinciporn.com/pics/redhea...cked/main.html

http://www.hardcoreassfucking.net/extreme_double_anal/

Looks like FPA's to me....

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Dollpix

http://www.vinciporn.com/pics/redhea...cked/main.html

http://www.hardcoreassfucking.net/extreme_double_anal/

Looks like FPA's to me....

Dollpix, did you really think that posting those links would help your argument? You aren't appealing to people who are new at what they do. While those two pages may appear to be full page ads, they are nothing more than the intelligent use of available ad space on the allowed free site pages. One is an index and the other is the main page. Neither would be considered an ad-only page because they are part of the standard navigational flow of a free site.

Never use someone else's listed site as a means of comparison or a way of defending your rejected site. Fix what they've asked you to fix or move on. If you don't understand the purpose or details of a rejection, then ask for a better explanation without trying to throw your fellow submitters under the bus or acting in a manner which could be perceived as condescending to the reviewers. If they had made a mistake, which does happen, they would have said so when they re-reviewed the site in your post.

[Dollpix]

You are absolutely right. But I really wasn't criticizing or trying
to throw anybody under a bus.

I was advised to view listed galleries to get an idea of what was
acceptable. I wasn't defending my site at all.

I realize that after almost 15 years in this business, I still have
much to learn.

I'll just keep trying until I figure it out.
And I do appreciate your responses.

Plugging along here....

[murray]

Originally Posted by Dollpix

Your submission:
Site Name: Fucked At Random
Site URL: http://dollpix.com/free1208/index.html
Category: Pornstar

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Site Structure Violation

?? Actually I looked at 3 sites that were listed and based
my structure on those.

Help, please.

This is a FPA
http://dollpix.com/free1208/index2.html