The Official Link O'Rama Rejection Thread II

[Useless]

Originally Posted by crown333

Dear Greenie,

Our free site, http://www.badgirlsporno.org/ was rejected for alleged "Blind or Misleading Links". Since we never place any blind or misleading links in our sites, we are at a loss as to what your reviewers were referring to. Please tell us what the problem appears to be, and we will try to fix it ASAP. Thanks.

Crown333

Disclaimer: I am not a review for LOR.

We? How many individuals were involved in the construction of those four pages?

Any reciprocal link which doesn't include the NAME of the link list is blind/misleading under LOR's policy. Also, SnizzShare is not a link list, it is not listing your site, and is therefore not a proper reciprocal link. The reciprocal link table for Bookmark Links has a link to pornsitejunkie.com in it. Pornsitejunkie.com is not a link list -- and no recip button should EVER have links to two different domains it.

You'll often find that the reciprocal links published by certain link lists won't mesh with the rules of others.

Your "Do Not Enter" link is crap. There is no reason to have it and it should be tossed.

There's a lot more wrong with that site, but I don't have time write to critique it beyond the warning page.

[crown333]

1. Thanks for the feedback on recips, etc., notwithstanding your tone.

2. Should we ever get an audience with the Bookmark people we will share with them your admonition.

3. We have no intention of joining your "war". We're merely attempting to comply with this link list's rules and get our site listed.

Thanks again,

Crown333

[Mateusz]

Originally Posted by crown333

2. Should we ever get an audience with the Bookmark people we will share with them your admonition.

I have no idea what you mean but it will be rather hard to get any bookmarkers when your Bookmark us! link puts a non-existing (404) page in someones bookmarks (not to mention its on another domain)

[crown333]

Originally Posted by Mateusz

I have no idea what you mean but it will be rather hard to get any bookmarkers when your Bookmark us! link puts a non-existing (404) page in someones bookmarks (not to mention its on another domain)

Thanks for your feedback, Mateusz. Our bad on the "Bookmark us" link, which we will correct.

In our reply post to Useless Warrior, we were not referring to our "Bookmark us" link, however. Our reference was to to his admonition of the recip banner supplied by link list "Bookmark Links", which includes two different URLs, over which we have no control. It seems that many link lists in this business have their own rules, and it's up to us to figure out how to assimilate them.

We appreciate you taking the time to look at our site and comment.

Crown333

[Useless]

Originally Posted by crown333

Our reference was to to his admonition of the recip banner supplied by link list "Bookmark Links", which includes two different URLs, over which we have no control. It seems that many link lists in this business have their own rules, and it's up to us to figure out how to assimilate them.

If you are looking for a motherly tone, then ask your mother's opinion of your free site. Greenie and MML are at the convention in Las Vegas right now, so I decided to help them by replying to your newbie question. If you wanted the reply of someone less experienced, less confident, you should have said so.

My reply was far from being an admonition and if you read it that way, it's probably due to your own insecurities.

And who is "we?" A free site is not a multi-person task. Though, in your case, it may be a good idea to get some help.

[crown333]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

If you are looking for a motherly tone, then ask your mother's opinion of your free site. Greenie and MML are at the convention in Las Vegas right now, so I decided to help them by replying to your newbie question. If you wanted the reply of someone less experienced, less confident, you should have said so.

My reply was far from being an admonition and if you read it that way, it's probably due to your own insecurities.

And who is "we?" A free site is not a multi-person task. Though, in your case, it may be a good idea to get some help.

To set the record straight, you did indeed admonish the "Bookmark Link" link list's recip banner which contained two URLs, that we downloaded from their site and included on our list of recips. That was their banner, not ours, and if it conflicts with this list's rules, then so be it.

Did we not thank you for your comments and critique? If that's not good enough for you, that's too bad, because we will not engage in any tit for tat exchanges with anyone.

Again, thanks for your input.

Crown333

[crown333]

Originally Posted by Greenie

It was that statement.

Greenie,

Noted. Our statement about tone was with specific reference to the following, which was the first comment in Useless's initial post following his disclaimer. Plainly, that leadoff statement had absolutely nothing to do with compliance with your rules, and was made for another purpose:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

We? How many individuals were involved in the construction of those four pages?

[Useless]

Originally Posted by crown333

Greenie,

Noted. Our statement about tone was with specific reference to the following, which was the first comment in Useless's initial post following his disclaimer. Plainly, that leadoff statement had absolutely nothing to do with compliance with your rules, and was made for another purpose:

I guess I shouldn't expect an answer... People like you make me rejoice that my lists are partner-only.

My disclaimer's intent was exactly as it was stated. I am not one of Greenie's employees. I didn't want you, or perhaps a member of your massive free site-building staff, to assume that I was one of his reviewers or think that my word was the final judgment on your free site. My tone may seem adversarial now because I've come to dislike you. But that is probably based on your inability to answer my simple question and repeated claims that my tone was anything but apathetic. At this very moment, I think you are giant douche bag. You may still win me over though. I am easily bribed.

No matter my tone, my employment status or the color of my eyes, your free site is a piece of shit and you are too fucking difficult to help.

[crown333]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

I guess I shouldn't expect an answer... People like you make me rejoice that my lists are partner-only.

My disclaimer's intent was exactly as it was stated. I am not one of Greenie's employees. I didn't want you, or perhaps a member of your massive free site-building staff, to assume that I was one of his reviewers or think that my word was the final judgment on your free site. My tone may seem adversarial now because I've come to dislike you. But that is probably based on your inability to answer my simple question and repeated claims that my tone was anything but apathetic. At this very moment, I think you are giant douche bag. You may still win me over though. I am easily bribed.

No matter my tone, my employment status or the color of my eyes, your free site is a piece of shit and you are too fucking difficult to help.

Useless,

Well several established link lists who listed our site disagree with you. So much for your keen insight and stellar "judgment".

Win you over????????? We're blowing you off, which is plainly more than you deserve. Your pathetic, clueless, gutter trash behavior speaks for itself, and we will not sully ourselves by dignifying it with anything but benign neglect. As far as we are concerned, you no longer exist.

To all others who graciously offered advice on our site, a hearty thanks.

Crown333

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by crown333

We're blowing you off, which is plainly more than you deserve.

You consistently say "we". Are you a duo? Trio? Quad? Or do you have MPD? (Multiple Personality Disorder)

[crown333]

Originally Posted by Licker4U

You consistently say "we". Are you a duo? Trio? Quad? Or do you have MPD? (Multiple Personality Disorder)

We literally means more than one person. Why is this an issue with you, or anyone?

Crown333

[JackDaniel's]

Originally Posted by crown333

We literally means more than one person. Why is this an issue with you, or anyone?

All this drama reminds me of a movie that I saw a long time ago called "Me, Myself & Irene"