Info on CONFICKER - how to tell if you are infected

[nate]

Could you use FP on Linux - I don't know, all I can
say about a professional webmaster using FrontPage for a professional
site at all is

Nothing is better than Front Page for working with tables. Nothing even comes close. Yeah, front page does goofy shit but if you use it to build html and finish that html in textpad it kicks ass. And I'm not unsure that MSN doesnt give preferences to pages with "frontpage" in the metas. If its all you use, and doubly if you use the extensions and assorted garbage that goes with a fronpage site, thats pretty lame, but as a tool it has strengths nothing else can touch.

Go ahead and laugh. Before you finish your 10 seconds of chucking I'll have a 10x10 table built and modified with merged cells, padding and alignment to suit my needs.

On the other hand, Most sites I see today are nothing but sliced up photoshop images. Pretty, but not my thing. To each his own I suppose.

[Useless]

Originally Posted by nate

Go ahead and laugh. Before you finish your 10 seconds of chucking I'll have a 10x10 table built and modified with merged cells, padding and alignment to suit my needs.

People still use tables?

[nate]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

People still use tables?

I use tables constantly. I fucking hate CSS.

You know it's the 21st Century right?

Yeah. Macs are 20th century. 1990 to be more specific. LOL at snail commercials.

I watched a college professor crash a mac 6 times in one hour showing us how to use some 3d app (like stratus or something) in college. I felt bad for him.

[whitey]

Originally Posted by nate

Nothing is better than Front Page for working with tables. Nothing even comes close. Yeah, front page does goofy shit but if you use it to build html and finish that html in textpad it kicks ass. And I'm not unsure that MSN doesnt give preferences to pages with "frontpage" in the metas. If its all you use, and doubly if you use the extensions and assorted garbage that goes with a fronpage site, thats pretty lame, but as a tool it has strengths nothing else can touch.

Go ahead and laugh. Before you finish your 10 seconds of chucking I'll have a 10x10 table built and modified with merged cells, padding and alignment to suit my needs.

On the other hand, Most sites I see today are nothing but sliced up photoshop images. Pretty, but not my thing. To each his own I suppose.

Tables in Dreamweaver are a snap.

And, yes, tables work better for some things than css. I hate the serial loading in poorly framed css tables and think most Surfers do too. As you still use tables, and have great tech knowledge, you likely think the same thing.

[nate]

Originally Posted by whitey

Tables in Dreamweaver are a snap.

And, yes, tables work better for some things than css. I hate the serial loading in poorly framed css tables and think most Surfers do too. As you still use tables, and have great tech knowledge, you likely think the same thing.

Its not bad, but not quite as easy Front Page, at least for initially creating the table.

Even so, getting back to the original point, dreamweaver requires windows or one of those apple things. It isnt for linux.

And no I don't want to use an emulator even if it claims it isnt an emulator.

[whitey]

Originally Posted by nate

Its not bad, but not quite as easy Front Page, at least for initially creating the table.

Even so, getting back to the original point, dreamweaver requires windows or one of those apple things. It isnt for linux.

And no I don't want to use an emulator even if it claims it isnt an emulator.

Since you use unix, have you tried the W3C released app, Amaya? I just downloaded it for windows, but it was built to run on unix pc's.

[nate]

Originally Posted by whitey

Since you use unix, have you tried the W3C released app, Amaya? I just downloaded it for windows, but it was built to run on unix pc's.

I'm gonna try it. Philosophically, I prefer open source software, although I do understand that all of my philosophy and $4.50 will get me a breve latte.