Cyveillance

InfoGuy · 2009-06-18, 11:19 AM

They're crawling your pages, collecting your content and reselling it raw/repackaged to their customers. Why should they reap the rewards from your bandwidth without sending you any human traffic or otherwise compensating you?

I'm not a lawyer and this is only my personal opinion, but I think that mentioning a brand on a website isn't trademark infringement and falls under fair use. There are plenty of criticism sites out there that would be shut down if that weren't the case.

2009-06-18, 11:19 AM	#4
InfoGuy I want to set the record straight - I thought the cop was a prostitute Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 297	They're crawling your pages, collecting your content and reselling it raw/repackaged to their customers. Why should they reap the rewards from your bandwidth without sending you any human traffic or otherwise compensating you? I'm not a lawyer and this is only my personal opinion, but I think that mentioning a brand on a website isn't trademark infringement and falls under fair use. There are plenty of criticism sites out there that would be shut down if that weren't the case. __________________ Free Speech Coalition \| Boycott .XXX / ICM Registry