website feeling- authentically amateur vs. businessy and sleek

Saturnin · 2009-08-16, 10:55 AM

True, true. Am just monkeying around wit the new one now....

rooty · 2009-08-16, 12:53 PM

I have been pondering about this exact same question for a long time now.

and there are lots of ways to look at it..

it can be compared to OLD vs NEW in a way.

with the amateurish look ... you get the authentic "i am a porn surfer like you" feeling

with the new top end designs web 2.0... you get the "this is a savvy site like you are" to a surfer. which i would say are more likely to impress the younger generations

so it all depends who you cater for I would say...

personally I have been working on a lot of sites that have that new web 2.0 look... but then again the old i-made-this-myself look works as time has proven..

but recently I have learned the following

* the user DON'T want to find anything.. it should all be right there for them to click on... fewer clicks to EXACTLY what the user wants is better
* a few silly pictures or video with a crappy description WONT arouse the user into buying... you have to SELL the porn to them... ( this ain't 1996 any more)
* seo is important but don't serve pages made for robots because that wont sell

let your users stand before SEO bots but don't leave them out of the picture.

perhaps some things to consider irrelevant to the new vs old look

Saturnin · 2009-08-16, 05:39 PM

Them's some good words. Am still sitting here trying to figure out which is best. However, reducing the number of clicks on the site may win out in the end.

Going to do some updating before postings the URLs... more to ponder.

2009-08-16, 12:53 PM	#2
rooty A woman is like beer. They look good, they smell good, and you'd step over your own mother just to get one! Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 51	I have been pondering about this exact same question for a long time now. and there are lots of ways to look at it.. it can be compared to OLD vs NEW in a way. with the amateurish look ... you get the authentic "i am a porn surfer like you" feeling with the new top end designs web 2.0... you get the "this is a savvy site like you are" to a surfer. which i would say are more likely to impress the younger generations so it all depends who you cater for I would say... personally I have been working on a lot of sites that have that new web 2.0 look... but then again the old i-made-this-myself look works as time has proven.. but recently I have learned the following * the user DON'T want to find anything.. it should all be right there for them to click on... fewer clicks to EXACTLY what the user wants is better * a few silly pictures or video with a crappy description WONT arouse the user into buying... you have to SELL the porn to them... ( this ain't 1996 any more) * seo is important but don't serve pages made for robots because that wont sell let your users stand before SEO bots but don't leave them out of the picture. perhaps some things to consider irrelevant to the new vs old look __________________ Nothing to see here really - My boring blog

2009-08-16, 10:55 AM	#1
Saturnin A woman is like beer. They look good, they smell good, and you'd step over your own mother just to get one! Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Edge of the Universe Posts: 53	True, true. Am just monkeying around wit the new one now....

2009-08-16, 05:39 PM	#3
Saturnin A woman is like beer. They look good, they smell good, and you'd step over your own mother just to get one! Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Edge of the Universe Posts: 53	Them's some good words. Am still sitting here trying to figure out which is best. However, reducing the number of clicks on the site may win out in the end. Going to do some updating before postings the URLs... more to ponder.