New celeb sponsor paying $40 PPS

[kmanrox]

Originally Posted by Simon

Well... I'm not Jim, but since it was me you quoted above I'll just say that this topic has been discussed a lot on this board and many of us will never use a morphed feed. There are a couple of links to discussions in this post if you want to see what's been said.

Oh, and kmanrox, one of the threads mentioned there was started by you, so it's definitely not the first time you heard some of us say we do not like and we won't use morphed feeds.

I don't want to debate why a morphed feed is better or worse that a non-morphed feed. I just want sponsors to realize that offering *only* morphed feeds will cost them lost affiliates for sure.

would you suggest a function on our generator to non-morph a feed output? it can be done.

[Simon]

Originally Posted by kmanrox

would you suggest a function on our generator to non-morph a feed output? it can be done.

Yes, absolutely, you should do that. And it should then provide the full original text of the blog post before ever being morphed in any way whatsoever.

Originally Posted by kmanrox

um you and 1 other guy out of millions of WM's are pretty much the only ones with negative things to say bro...

Very few who dislike something will take the time to tell you about, and even fewer to explain why. If you wish to discount the value of what you've learned here and prefer to bask in the praise of the "millions of WMs" that's fine too. It's easy for me and the 1 other guy to just skip using the feeds of any sponsor who doesn't understand why non-morphing feeds are needed.