The Official Link O'Rama Rejection Thread II

MrMaryLou · 2009-12-29, 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by meloncash

The following site was rejected for this reason but it is not immediately obvious what the violation in question is? Please advise, and thanks for all the great traffic.

http://www.38dds.com/sarl/

Your Enter Link dont work and the site has a bad scroll at 1024 wide.

rblight · 2010-01-01, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrMaryLou

Your Enter Link dont work and the site has a bad scroll at 1024 wide.

It worked for me. I also believe the width is within range, 800 pixels. I have other sites listed that are wider and longer. Not trying to argue. I just want to make sure my sites comply with the rules. I hadn't had one rejected in a long time and have used this template before with success.

MrMaryLou · 2010-01-01, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rblight

It worked for me. I also believe the width is within range, 800 pixels. I have other sites listed that are wider and longer. Not trying to argue. I just want to make sure my sites comply with the rules. I hadn't had one rejected in a long time and have used this template before with success.

Well the enter link dont work and its sill wide in IE 8

rblight · 2010-01-06, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrMaryLou

Well the enter link dont work and its sill wide in IE 8

What is the problem with the enter link?