|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
|
Quote:
But if you've already done the 301 redirect, redirecting the non www urls to the www url and you've done the google webmaster setup AND YOU DO THE CONONICAL TAG, then you've done everything possible and conical url's are not your problem. Any one of those three things should resolve any conical URL issue but the cononical tag is the latest thing added to resolve these types of issues. 800 inbound links from 5 sites is a lot of inbound links, especially from so few of sources. I can easily believe that google would see that as an attempt to spoof the SERPS. Especially since it's an algorithm that only knows certain rules to follow |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Operator! Give me the number for 911!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 138
|
Ok, I had to do a little follow-up and send out a few letters documenting my site’s problems.
Matt Cutt’s explanation of the canonical tag is perfect. Around the 5-minute mark he explains things that effect your site and what to do to prevent a canonical situation: 1. Normalize URLs 2. Link consistently on the site 3. Implement 301 redirects 4. Set preferred domain 5. Include standardized URLs in sitemap 6. Include canonical attribute Before my situation I had done 1,2,3 and 5. I have since completed 4 and 6. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|