Mr MaryLou /GreenGuy

[T Pat]

I submitted a site to link-o-rama earlier in the week
http://www.tiajuanawhores.com/ll/spi...iage/index.htm
I noticed that it wasn’t listed, after going over the site again I discovered that I had screwed up your recip link. The site had started with a green font and I decided to change it to red and did a search and replace so the link went something like “link-o-rama/redguylatina” I’m pretty sure that was the problem can I resubmit it?

P.S. Mr MarryLou you can slap me at On The Bench Saturday for being so careless

[MrMaryLou]

That may have been it but the lack of nudity would make it a close call

[T Pat]

Originally posted by MrMaryLou
That may have been it but the lack of nudity would make it a close call

I put some thought into this site and built it with the intention of it getting shown to wives. My understanding is women aren’t turned on by graphic nudity.
(guess that will teach me for thinking)
I’ll try resubmitting it and keep my fingers crossed
Thanx
Pat

[Greenguy]

I wouldn't say that you need graphic nudity, but maybe a little more than a nipple here & there

Also, the picture quality is not that great

[SmutMistress]

yes, I'm being nosy and butting in....

TijuanaPat: Women absolutely do enjoy full nudity. They might lie about it, but there are stats showing that an awful lot of women surf for porn (hardcore included), watch pornos (nothing but hardcore) and aren't as prudish as they'd like people to think.

So, instead of limiting nudity, especially when you want the female in question to participate in a threesome...maybe you could show shots of a threesome where the women are just enjoying the hell out of it. It might work. And that way, both partners get turned on.

just my two cents...I'll butt out now.

[T Pat]

Originally posted by Greenguy
I wouldn't say that you need graphic nudity, but maybe a little more than a nipple here & there

Also, the picture quality is not that great

First Of All Green Guy I want to thank you for this forum
I got into this business in a backasswards kind of a way I knew zip about the adult biz and very little html. I bought a cheap pay site off of ebay, converted it over to Tijuana whores, bought a camera went to Tijuana took some crappy pictures and uploaded them, bought some traffic and nothing happened. So I paid to have my site search engine optimized went back to Tijuana took more crappy pictures, uploaded them, bought traffic and still nothing happened. Then I decided to learn how the hell to market an adult site. I found GreenGuyandJim a couple of days after you guys got back from Florida last summer, after reading all the posts I decided that if that many people could afford to travel to Florida then people that knew the adult biz were members of your forum and I made it my forum too.
I attended the first On The Bench with MrMarryLou and will never forget him asking how many people had hubs and me saying to myself “what the fuck is a hub”. It’s been a steep learning curve I’ve learned a lot and am actually starting to make a little $ and continue to learn more daily.
But my pictures are still shitty I use a Pentax Optio550 (5 mega pixel) The lighting in the brothel rooms sucks one bare bulb, the lights are on the ceiling in some rooms the wall in others so there are shadows everywhere. I have tried in vain to take some decent pictures With out having to haul a bunch of lights into the brothels and back and forth across the boarder
That said I’m going to bring a professional photographer with me next week and he can haul the lights and explain to customs what the lights are for.
There’s only a hand full of pay sites in my niche I have the most photos and girls, the photos the other sites have are the same quality. Better quality photos can only make my membership retention higher as well AS making it easier to get listed.
Enough rambling also want to say Thanx to MrMarryLou and you members too for the education.
Here’s the first site I built: http://www.creamfilledsluts.com/index.htm
Here’s the last site I built: http://www.tiajuanawhores.com/ll/tij...dict/index.htm
I think I’ve come along ways

[Greenguy]

Oh man, now I feel bad It didn't kick into my thick skull that you actually took the pics until I read you post. I just assumed they were overcompressed.

I too took really crappy pics when I 1st started doing shoot, but as I got better camera, I ended up with better pics

I've never heard of that camera, but the last one I bought was very, very nice & very, very affordable:
http://www.nikonusa.com/template.php...roductNr=25519

Here's an example of a pics it took:
http://www.link-o-rama.com/wmxx/dscn4431.jpg
That pics has been resized form 1600x1200 & compressed a bit - it is 177k (big for free sites) but it is a good example of the quality of the pics that it takes.

I mention this because you might be better off buying a different camera instead of hiring a photographer

[DangerDave]

More light is definitely the key Pat..

The poor quality of the pics just wasn't good enuff

DD

[T Pat]

I really don't think it's the camera, it's the operater I bought the camera on sale for just under $600
I'm sure DD is right on my main malfunction being lack of light.
Anyway this old dog can learn new tricks and as much as I hate spending money I've never been to a professional photo shoot and am sure I'll learn a thing or two just as long as I can find a couple of good catholic latina whores that aren't worried about there families seeing them on the net

[Horny Dude]

Tijuana Pat hit me up! We run a Latina site out here in San Diego www.sandiegolatinas.com Got alot of hot Latina girls that we shoot exclusively out here in SD. Wouldn't mind helping you out.

webmaster[@]happysock.com

|rasta|

[T Pat]

Originally posted by Horny Dude
Tijuana Pat hit me up! We run a Latina site out here in San Diego www.sandiegolatinas.com Got alot of hot Latina girls that we shoot exclusively out here in SD. Wouldn't mind helping you out.

webmaster[@]happysock.com

|rasta|

I stumbled onto your sight a month or two ago and wondered who owned it. I sent you a PM coulc you gie me a call when you have a few minutes? I would love to pick your brain
thanx
Pat

[stev0]

Those images are fuzzy, but the file sizes are huge! I think you need better lighting conditions when taking the photos, it looks like they're overexposed. And some of those pics are nearly 300kb each, if you were to run them through a batch compression program like Ulead Smartsaver you could easily bring them down to about 30k each.