|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#9 | ||
Took the hint.
|
Paul, with a name and address, I can directory almost anyone in the US or Canada online and get in contact with them. Providing a copy of the ID presented and the model release forms would be more than enough for almost anyone to contact the model. Any level of information less than that would not be in compliance with 2257.
Quote:
Do you (or any other content provider) supply this level of information for every photo that you sell? You would need model release (to prove right to sell) and copy of the ID of the performer to show the true age, etc. No blurring or masking permitted, it would appear! There is no case law at this point that makes the website owner into a "producer" of the content. Nobody has gone down this road that I am aware of. However, certain lawyers have suggested this as a route of possible attack by the AG to get people. There isn't even any case law that says the documents must be specifically at YOUR place of business. Quote:
Law also does not state that those records must be maintained in the US. Look closely at the video industry to see what 30 + years of legal battles does to set precedents. Alex |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|