PenisBot & Wetplace: New rule

[kit]

Reciprocal number restrictions
-----------------------------------

Many link sites order webmasters to use reciprocal links (looking like link-farms) with 4 or even more links leading to the link site. We stand against those starwars and will not accept submissions that have more than 2 (two) different links per reciprocal block. Examples:

absolutelyfreeporn.net (10 links)
onlybestsex.com (4 links)

Read this topic, this is our future if it couldn't stop:
http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/30575.htm

[Pentarh]

Agree

[RedCherry]

Originally Posted by kit

Reciprocal number restrictions
-----------------------------------

Many link sites order webmasters to use reciprocal links (looking like link-farms) with 4 or even more links leading to the link site. We stand against those starwars and will not accept submissions that have more than 2 (two) different links per reciprocal block. Examples:

absolutelyfreeporn.net (10 links)
onlybestsex.com (4 links)

Read this topic, this is our future if it couldn't stop:
http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/30575.htm

Good idea, I think I will drop mine to 2 I did have 3 on red cherry, I'm going to delete the 3rd now. Don't want that happening to me either.

[Pedronas]

I agree of course

[kit]

Thank you Virginia!
I'm very serious about http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/30575.htm
It can happen with us if we couldn't stop linkfarming process.

[RedCherry]

Originally Posted by kit

Thank you Virginia!
I'm very serious about http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/30575.htm
It can happen with us if we couldn't stop linkfarming process.

You don't have to convince me, I'm the person who made a page interlinking all my sites, and putting it on every domain I owned. (this was 4 years ago) and watched about 75% of my domains get banned off google overnight.

Some came back, others never did. Anything that looks iffy now, I will RUN to change it.

[SI]

Good move kit. Someone of the big guys should try to stop this link-farm madness and you the first one. I think this effort will end in success if another big and not so big owners will do the same. Owners and webmasters, everyone will wins on it.

[Greenguy]

kit - any chance you can just post the info instead of links to a paid members board?

[RedCherry]

in a nutshell a lot of directories got banned off google, these are non-adult webmasters, and some had sites that had been directories for years, and watched their sites get dropped.

I've been a member of that board for years, I just read the first few pages, but that is the short one, hopefully Kit will post more up on the details.

[Greenguy]

RedCherry - I like ya, you have a lot of potential as far as being one of the good people on this board.
Please, for the love of clean up your sig file

[Preacher]

Originally Posted by Greenguy

kit - any chance you can just post the info instead of links to a paid members board?

Hmmm, that's the second time I've seen you reply that you can't see the thread, weird thing is I can read it just fine and I'm not a member? Not that I have the time to read a 58 page thread dating back to July 28th mind you.

-Preacher

[RedCherry]

Originally Posted by Greenguy

RedCherry - I like ya, you have a lot of potential as far as being one of the good people on this board.
Please, for the love of clean up your sig file

What is wrong with it? I need to read more carefully.

[Greenguy]

MML gave me his un/pw - 59 pages my ass.

If someone can just quote from where the Google employee posted, then that's all the info I'd need

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by RedCherry

What is wrong with it? I need to read more carefully.

Keep it 80 or under (you were well over 100 the last 2 times)

[mb]

I agree with this 100% and will begin declining all free sites that list a recip that has more than two links on it.

Thanks for posting this, Kit.

[RedCherry]

Is this better?

[Greenguy]

Much better - thank you

[kit]

WebmasterWorld have only one forum for paid members, it's a "Supporters forum".
This thread posted in public accessed area:
http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/30575.htm
and counts over 20 pages. I juct can't post it all here ;-)

In short: Google start to penalize directories using overoprimization or reciprocal tricks. Also they implemented content duplicate filters and it's also against directories.

[RedCherry]

Originally Posted by Greenguy

Much better - thank you

np, my SEO comes out when I link to my sites I tend to put spider food in the anchor text, lol

[Yahook]

I agree with you Kit. I can add - I will not accept sites which contains too big recip links.

[Yahook]

For those who doesn't know what linklists I have

My linklists are:

http://www.hqpornlinks.com/
http://www.fuckingbeaver.com/

Also I reanimated my old linklist http://www.teensex4you.com/

And I have some small linklists - about 4, I will not post urls now

[RedCherry]

Got a reply from G-support--
"Thank you for your note. We understand that you're concerned about your site, www.------.com. Unfortunately, we are unable to send personal responses to all of the requests we receive to review individual website content.

Certain actions such as buying or selling links to increase a site's PageRank value or cloaking - writing text in such a way that it can be seen by search engines but not by users - can result in penalization. Please review our quality guidelines at http:// www. google .com/webmasters/ guidelines.html for more information. If you identify problems with your website and make the changes necessary to comply with these guidelines, please do not hesitate to contact us.

We are sorry that we cannot provide individual assistance at this time.

Regards,
The Google Team"

My site was not a directory. It *was* the recipient of a site wide link on another banned site. Perhaps the filter penalized both the "sellers" of links and the "buyers" of same. In my case, these were two sites I owned each with unrelated, non-duplicate content, so it was natural to link from one site to the other. No links were bought or sold (sic)

Here was one post on that thread that someone got a reply from google. FYI

[Preacher]

Originally Posted by Yahook

I agree with you Kit. I can add - I will not accept sites which contains too big recip links.

How big is too big?

This is one of the reasons I think it would be great if every linklist could standardize the size of their recips. Like if everyone agreed on 150x70 or something. It would make the recip tables look so much nicer.

I know it's a pipe dream, but a boy has to have his dreams...

[RedCherry]

Originally Posted by Preacher

How big is too big?

This is one of the reasons I think it would be great if every linklist could standardize the size of their recips. Like if everyone agreed on 150x70 or something. It would make the recip tables look so much nicer.

I know it's a pipe dream, but a boy has to have his dreams...

Thats why I don't care if people change my links to match the site, and make all the other links for the other sites the same way.

I just closed my submits until I can re-do all my recip tables, hopefully will have them back open by this evening.

[RedCherry]

Originally Posted by Yahook

For those who doesn't know what linklists I have

My linklists are:

http://www.hqpornlinks.com/
http://www.fuckingbeaver.com/

Also I reanimated my old linklist http://www.teensex4you.com/

And I have some small linklists - about 4, I will not post urls now

http://www.hqpornlinks.com/ I love your link list, I get a lot of traffic. I didn't know about the others, will add them to my list.