|
2007-02-10, 09:54 PM | #1 |
It is better to watch things then to do them
|
question about story content
I have been spending some time working on story sites and a type of hub for it. I was comparing stats in sextracker and noticed a site (have seen the site for years) and when i checked it out it was filled with pedo stories and promoted rape, pr*teen sex and some other stuff.
Now, no matter what, that is a subject i would never touch and think is discpicable, but is there nothing legally wrong with it? I am all for an individuals rights and free speech, but some things like this really makes me want to do great bodily harm to them. Escpecially now that i have a beautiful 8 month old daughter. |
2007-02-11, 12:36 AM | #2 |
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
Some people are being prosecuted for such stories. What will happen if such a case reaches the Supreme Court is any one's guess. Someone will need enough money to actually get a case that far.
No matter what the legal outcome is, it's sick and shouldn't be posted. I don't want to touch anything that's degrading much less use description about illegal actions. |
2007-02-11, 04:07 PM | #3 |
Heh Heh Heh! Lisa! Vampires are make believe, just like elves and gremlins and eskimos!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Moscow
Posts: 78
|
Depends on a country..
|
2007-02-11, 04:15 PM | #4 |
Certified Nice Person
|
The written word traditionally enjoyed much more freedom from prosecution than other media, but within the last year, I've seen at least one news story about a web site owner being charged with obscenity due to, I think, pedo stories. One can write and fantasize whatever they wish. It's the publishing of such material that'll get you arrested.
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
2007-02-11, 04:23 PM | #5 |
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
|
Slippery slope...
|
2007-02-11, 04:38 PM | #6 |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Next door to a kid with a moped.
Posts: 1,492
|
Cencoring the written word, prosecuting and incarcerating people for their writings. Now there's a slippery slope if there ever was one.
I hate pedos and sexual predators as much as the next guy. I don't necessarily hate all authors who include such material in their books. I understand the difference between a story with passages that might seem distateful, but are "valid" as parts of a greater work of fiction, and a smut story written by and aimed solely at a twisted, sick audience, but I'm not sure if we can make that distinction work legally. The whole idea just sounds too much like thought control too me.
__________________
BUY MY PORNSITES! Last edited by Lemmy; 2007-02-11 at 04:40 PM.. |
2007-02-11, 07:22 PM | #7 |
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
|
Its amazing the things you hear webmasters that supposedly are fighting for the right to free speech post - Larry Flynt must have ringing ears right about now
|
2007-02-11, 07:32 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: About to be evicted!!!!
Posts: 4,082
|
When Japanese comics are translated into English for sale on the American market, they sometimes have to change the age of characters because they are 'old enough' in Japan but 'underage' in America.
Ironically it is illegal to publish peado stories in England, but I would guess that some of our stories have to be adapted for America because the minimum age here is 16, whereas in the USA it is 18. |
2007-02-11, 08:50 PM | #9 |
It is better to watch things then to do them
|
I'm sure in the general scheme of things there are several shades of grey and it definately is a slippery slope. Opening the door for 1 thing could start the ball rolling on many other things. I agree 100%.
Now the other side of me, one that doesn't care how hypocritical it is, wants to do everything i can to harm people that write, shoot, hell even think about children in a sexual way. I understand what some are saying about differences in consent ages and whatnot. I know different places and different times have different "legal" ages, but the one i saw was directly being promoted as "p*do" and "prete*n" sex. When your talking about 6,7,8,9,10 year olds, i dont care the time or place it is wrong. They are directly catering to pedophiles and , in my opinion, anyone that gets turned on or wants to read that is a pedophile. So, although i can see the point of not wanting the government step in and start a landslide, i find the shit dispicable as i'm sure you all do. Maybe governments not the answer, but i'd still like to get my "pretty little hands" on any of them i could. Again this isn't about "legality" in general, it's about a certain site i saw. I appreciate all the input. I'm sure this is something that could go on and on. |
|
|