Is this OK?

[Fonz]

I declined that site TekAngel.

Oh wait, you were approved

[Mr Spock]

BTW - unlinked, it's perfectly fine with me.

Why is it ok unlinked , but not linked?

[Cleo]

Originally Posted by Mr Spock

Why is it ok unlinked , but not linked?

Depending on the header it may or may not be a blind link.

Personally when I use a header I never link it unless the header reads something like click here to take a tour.

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Mr Spock

Why is it ok unlinked , but not linked?

It's a general rule of thumb with free sites to not link any large graphic header.
[I didn't see Cleo's reply to the question before I replied.]

As to the other topic, hardcore on on the warning page, I've no problem with it. In fact, I don't mind when the warning text is missing. As we've stated here far too many times, the vast abundance of traffic that will hit a free site is going to come from a link list. What would the point be of warning a porn surfer that he is going to see more porn? I think we should change the name from warning to ad page #1.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

...What would the point be of warning a porn surfer that he is going to see more porn?...

Good Faith Effort, my friend.

GOOD FAITH EFFORT!

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Greenie

Good Faith Effort, my friend.

GOOD FAITH EFFORT!

If I knew a good girl named Faith, I would put in the effort.

[LD]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

As to the other topic, hardcore on on the warning page, I've no problem with it. In fact, I don't mind when the warning text is missing. As we've stated here far too many times, the vast abundance of traffic that will hit a free site is going to come from a link list. What would the point be of warning a porn surfer that he is going to see more porn? I think we should change the name from warning to ad page #1.

I was thinking it was some cover your ass legal type thing...like the warning on a TV dinner that says "product may be hot after heating and will burn your ass"...Then if you get burned and try to sue, they can always say "hey stoopid, we warned you..."

But I too see a lot more hardcore on the warning page, usually in a banner ad. I typically do not do it on my submissions for fear of rejections, but if it becomes acceptable count me in...

[Cleo]

Personally I could care less what someone puts on the so called warning page. You could have a girl sucking cum out of a shemale's ass for all I care.

I view the so called warning page as someplace to stick some ads on.

[SheepGuy]

Originally Posted by Cleo

I view the so called warning page as someplace to stick some ads on.

I'm with Cleo. I don't believe a legalish warning about pornography does anything to protect your ass from whoever or whatever the latest legal bogeyman is anyways

[dexcool]

Originally Posted by Cleo

You could have a girl sucking cum out of a shemale's ass for all I care.

umm, what site is that, it sounds like a good niche.

[NY Jester]

Spock, some LL's rules state that there can be no Hardcore on the warning page..this includes banners or age graphics.

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by NY Jester

Spock, some LL's rules state that there can be no Hardcore on the warning page..this includes banners or age graphics.

I haven't seen that in a long time, who are they?

[LD]

Originally Posted by Licker4U

I haven't seen that in a long time, who are they?

I had a reject a couple of months ago for hardcore on the warning page...I can't remember who it was though. I usually keep banner ads which contain hardcore off the warning page as well as hardcore pics, but after reading this thread I think I should lift that restriction.

I was reading something on another forum that warnings and softcore on the warning is actually a good thing. I mean if you tell someone there's gonna be fucking inside, they're more likely to come inside. And the softcore leaves 'em wanting more.

I have no idea if these are good sales tactics, but sounds somewhat valid. (?)

[papagmp]

Works for me - btw, there are a lot of LL's that state "no hardcore pics on the warning page"

It doesn't bother me cuz there are hardcore pics on every page that I would link to you from. Surfers either landed inside my LL of came through my warning page - either way, that had to be searching on porn - go figure....