Is this OK?

[bluebrit]

That's ok with me. A little graphic maybe but I’m beginning to see a lot of FS coming in that have obvious hardcore pictures on the index page. I personally am not keen on this as the index is supposed to give the surfer a warning that tells them if they continue further, they will see porn.

What's the point of a warning on the index if you see porn as soon as you view the index page?

My finger is hovering over the reject button for these but I’d like to hear what other people think about this and whether your getting the same sort of FS submits.

[sue-fl]

That is fine with me TekAngel!

Great banners Preacher I don't find them disgusting at all quite the opposite

Bluebrit I don't reject sites because of hardcore on the warning page. I didn't realize some LL's do it either. It does make sense what you wrote though as it is a warning page.

I do get a lot of fs submits with this and I also make them with hardcore on the warning page. Haven't run into a problem so far.

[Mr Spock]

Originally Posted by bluebrit

That's ok with me. A little graphic maybe but I’m beginning to see a lot of FS coming in that have obvious hardcore pictures on the index page. I personally am not keen on this as the index is supposed to give the surfer a warning that tells them if they continue further, they will see porn.

What's the point of a warning on the index if you see porn as soon as you view the index page?

My finger is hovering over the reject button for these but I’d like to hear what other people think about this and whether your getting the same sort of FS submits.

Whats the point of rejecting a fs for hardcore on the warning page , If they came from a LL they were already exposed to a warning page and should be expecting porn. If they came to the fs via a search query they were looking for porn as well?

[bluebrit]

Originally Posted by Mr Spock

Whats the point of rejecting a fs for hardcore on the warning page , If they came from a LL they were already exposed to a warning page and should be expecting porn. If they came to the fs via a search query they were looking for porn as well?

That's a comment somebody made to me before posting my question but i wanted to ask your thoughts on this because i like knowing how other people feel about it and i do consider it important to have a clear understanding on whats ok and what isn't. Needless to say i'm ok with the porn on the front page on submits as it seems ok with everyone else and just so you know, i have not rejected any submits because of this, i was just getting a little itchy over seeing so much of it without a clear understanding of what everyone else thought.

Thanks for the replies everyone and TekAngel sorry, I kinda took over your thread a little without meaning too.

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by bluebrit

What's the point of a warning on the index if you see porn as soon as you view the index page?

A warning on the index page isn't required anymore, at least not at the 45 lists I submit to. There was a thread about this a while back but I can't figure out how to find old threads. Mad Hatter I think started the thread and it was generally agreed that it was OK to have hardcore on the index/warning page if the site is not on the root domain.

To me it's an index page, not a "warning" page.