Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jaden
Ummmm yeah...I have to say I do think it would be wise. Especially if you are putting your name and reputation behind it....
|
Oh, really? Duplicating the work of every single reviewer actually eliminates the need in reviewers themselve. Employees are needed to free your time for more important things. Of course we are responsible for them - but we have to trust them in reasonable tasks in exchange.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jaden
And you think that LL's don't??????? How do you think so much of this stuff gets found in the first place.
Jaden
|
I think you do. You check every thing you are aware of. But you CAN'T check it before it happened first time (you can suppose things people can do but if you do not think anyone will do it - you won't check for it before it happens). That's all I tried to explain - we did not checked for this words in metategs just because we could not think anyone will use them this way. We look stupid here - and if you ask me I would prefer to look unfair than stupid (many programs feel great looking unfair because webmasters still make big money with them) - but it is the fact and I can't evade it now.
I can lie and tell we did it and get this thread down - but I do not want to. I do not want to tell we did it while we didn't.
You are free to make own conclusions but I
know the truth. And the truth is we were stupid although fair
2005-03-16, 12:56 PM
Threaded Mode