 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
2005-03-20, 04:08 AM
|
#1 |
|
No offence Apu, but when they were handing out religions you must have been out taking a whizz
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 285
 |
oh yeah first time.. sure thing
I've had enough of seeing shit like "sex actions" Hard sex actions.. yes sir, speak fucking english |
|
|
|
2005-03-20, 09:36 AM
|
#2 |
|
Certified Nice Person
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dirty Undies, NY
Posts: 11,268
|
Why is it that people cannot properly describe a series of 20 pics? Well, if you are describing pics of clothed individuals as nude, you are either lying or you're fucking idiot. There's no other possibility.
There are submitters who over-state what is really occurring in the pics. They describe what may be happening even if the pics don't back it up. That happens with anal a lot. If I can't see a cock slipping in to an asshole, it's not anal. But some people give anal descriptions for pics that have been taken from a bad angle and or such a distance so that you can't really tell where the cock is going or even if a cock is present. That happens with lesbian pics too. Two women posing together doesn't make them lesbians.
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
