Someone using my web-page

emmanuelle · 2005-10-24, 04:34 PM

I hope that I am not hijacking kalle's thread, but this is an issue that has bothered me for some time.
Which of these methods are considered 'acceptable' and why?

1. brutusblack.thebestporn.com/ (this site was not reviewed, however has the #1 google listing)

2. brutusblack.pornreporters.com/
(not only "reviewed" without our blessing, but erroneous information and content stolen from our member area)

3. www.karadavis.com/movies/emmas_balloons/ - the same issue as kalle's, they are pulling my tour within their frameset

4. www.pornresource.com/videos/brutus_black/
the same system as karadavis is using.

Are these generally accepted industry practices? Do site owners have the right to forbid affiliates from these tactics? Should they even want to? Or is it simply a courtesy not given? Is a paysite owner's only recourse to have their own SE guru on staff, or trademark their domains? Truthfully I've never been certain whether or not I should be allowed to feel annoyed by these things; which is why I'd like to hear other's opinions.

cybersexhound · 2005-10-24, 10:28 PM

I know for a fact you can report these tactics to google and they will ban the site from the search results if that helps any

Quote:

Originally Posted by emmanuelle

I hope that I am not hijacking kalle's thread, but this is an issue that has bothered me for some time.
Which of these methods are considered 'acceptable' and why?

1. brutusblack.thebestporn.com/ (this site was not reviewed, however has the #1 google listing)

2. brutusblack.pornreporters.com/
(not only "reviewed" without our blessing, but erroneous information and content stolen from our member area)

3. www.karadavis.com/movies/emmas_balloons/ - the same issue as kalle's, they are pulling my tour within their frameset

4. www.pornresource.com/videos/brutus_black/
the same system as karadavis is using.

Are these generally accepted industry practices? Do site owners have the right to forbid affiliates from these tactics? Should they even want to? Or is it simply a courtesy not given? Is a paysite owner's only recourse to have their own SE guru on staff, or trademark their domains? Truthfully I've never been certain whether or not I should be allowed to feel annoyed by these things; which is why I'd like to hear other's opinions.

2005-10-24, 04:34 PM	#1
emmanuelle 0100011101100101011001010 1101011001000000100001101 1010000110100101100011 Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Montreal Posts: 1,441	I hope that I am not hijacking kalle's thread, but this is an issue that has bothered me for some time. Which of these methods are considered 'acceptable' and why? 1. brutusblack.thebestporn.com/ (this site was not reviewed, however has the #1 google listing) 2. brutusblack.pornreporters.com/ (not only "reviewed" without our blessing, but erroneous information and content stolen from our member area) 3. www.karadavis.com/movies/emmas_balloons/ - the same issue as kalle's, they are pulling my tour within their frameset 4. www.pornresource.com/videos/brutus_black/ the same system as karadavis is using. Are these generally accepted industry practices? Do site owners have the right to forbid affiliates from these tactics? Should they even want to? Or is it simply a courtesy not given? Is a paysite owner's only recourse to have their own SE guru on staff, or trademark their domains? Truthfully I've never been certain whether or not I should be allowed to feel annoyed by these things; which is why I'd like to hear other's opinions.