Regarding "Roman Maroni" reason once again

[Useless]

Well, I've officially become annoyed by this thread. Took longer than usually, but it finally happened. You can't really spend much time arguing with someone who submits his free sites to 100 link lists yet doesn't know who owns link lists on THE link list/free site board. You also can't argue with someone who says that it's in the best interest of link lists to reject "the more profitable sites" whatever the fuck that means.

Here's the truth. Link lists NEED to list submitted free sites. A link list that only listed HFSs would fail due to the lack of back links and reciprocal linking. Link lists want to list the best free sites they can find. I thought that was obvious, but I guess it isn't.

Are there rotten fucks who own link lists? Of course.
Yahook
Fortunately, there are very,very few. Certainly not enough to warrant this conversation.

Ecchi, please don't take my tone as hostility. This is just how I speak. BTW, I liked your old avatar better.

[ecchi]

Can you honestly look in the mirror and claim that the statement "it is in their interest to refuse to list the the more profitable sites" is NOT an overbroad generalization???

Read the line through again. My error is actually that it does not infer that anyone does this. If I said "it is in a driver's interest to drive safely" would you assume that this meant that all driver's drive safely? No you would not, it is just that you subconsciously think badly of LL owners yourself, so see bad things about them whatever you read.

Given that you've now 'adjusted' your statements to 'some' or 'a few' link lists

I have not 'adjusted' my statements, I 'explained' them for people who misinterpreted them. (Should I say "for the few people who misinterpreted them" before someone points out that not all members of this board did so.)

it's difficult to fathom why you can't simply admit that your prior statements were in fact overbroad generalizations

Because if I did I would be lying, and my mother brought me up better than that.

As for ecchi's statement, ........ the best way to deal with them is...delete them from your database.

A long way back I pointed out that I do this. However Useless Warrior and Mad Max have already posted to say I should not do this, I should keep a list of everyone who wrongs me and get revenge by posting their names on the boards.

it's in the best interest of link lists to reject "the more profitable sites" whatever the fuck that means.

If you don't even know what it means, then why the fuck are you arguing about it ?

You can't really spend much time arguing with someone who submits his free sites to 100 link lists yet doesn't know who owns link lists on THE link list/free site board.

Exactly what is the point of going through the profiles and learning everyone else's business? At best that is a waste of time, at worst an invasion of privacy. I assume everyone here works in the online porn industry in some way and that is all I need to know. I have no need learn everything about their business life just to post on the board. And to suggest that this is necessary to post here is more than a little ridiculous.

Here's the truth. Link lists NEED to list submitted free sites. A link list that only listed HFSs would fail due to the lack of back links and reciprocal linking. Link lists want to list the best free sites they can find. I thought that was obvious, but I guess it isn't.

Jesus Christ change the record will you. You keep saying this and I keep pointing out that this is not the issue here. Even those who strongly disagree with my posts admit that some LL owners do not play fair.

Ecchi, please don't take my tone as hostility.

This is an open board, if I post something other members are free to post whatever they like about my post. If I was likely to take offence at the tone of the posts, then I should avoid posting.

[MrYum]

Okay, I don't have time to continue this debate over symantics. I and apparently several other people think your statements were overbroad generalizations...and I certainly do not think subconsciously or otherwise that most link list owners do 'bad things'. The vast majority of my best friends in this business are in fact link list owners.

All that said, we're gonna have to agree to disagree on this one...cuz I'm done banging my head against this wall

[stuveltje]

Originally Posted by MrYum

Okay, I don't have time to continue this debate over symantics. I and apparently several other people think your statements were overbroad generalizations...and I certainly do not think subconsciously or otherwise that most link list owners do 'bad things'. The vast majority of my best friends in this business are in fact link list owners.

All that said, we're gonna have to agree to disagree on this one...cuz I'm done banging my head against this wall

Mr Yum dont bang your head, thats not needed, all have their own view about linksites and their reviewers, we know about how we review our own list, i know you know, all may post their opinion on this board, that makes this board also very populair, oke their is an difference if they start to call names to persons like facist or racist or start to asume LL s will reject good sites , we know better,and about racist.....not for this thread but hell the ones who said some lls are racist on this board should realy meet my hubby, fact is, all can do what they want when they make a free site, sure make is chinese, english whatever, but dont nag if some linksites reject or blacklist you if they dont like the bad english, no mather how your site is doing in ses and nop no linksite will reject a quality site, quality will attrack surfers and make then come back...........maybe i talk shit, and maybe some will post now, yes you talk shit.but then i dont care you can all kiss my dutch ass who dont agree So Mr Yum, i know how you do on the net, dont banghead and for real who cares what others are thinking of your or my ll, your ll, your rules, fuck them all

[Surfn]

Originally Posted by MrYum

Okay, I don't have time to continue this debate over symantics. I and apparently several other people think your statements were overbroad generalizations...and I certainly do not think subconsciously or otherwise that most link list owners do 'bad things'. The vast majority of my best friends in this business are in fact link list owners.

All that said, we're gonna have to agree to disagree on this one...cuz I'm done banging my head against this wall

It really is pointless arguing with his

[stuveltje]

Originally Posted by Surfn

It really is pointless arguing with his

also what surfn said......yeah yeah i am in my simple mode

[Halfdeck]

Submitters, just be glad there's no minimum IQ requirement for submitting free sites

[stuveltje]

Originally Posted by Halfdeck

Submitters, just be glad there's no minimum IQ requirement for submitting free sites

ha thats a nice one i can put an IQ rule i my lists..........goodmorning halfdeck