|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
|
Bill - I agree with all 5 of the things you posted. I have been trying to address those exact things on my pages recently. The issue I have is that a lot of people consider this all a "bunch of BS". Which, to me, means that they will not do ANYTHING to try to "fix" the problems on their sites. I am just trying to better my site. Like I said, I am trying to see where other people stand on this as well. Not really getting much of a "discussion" though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
What can I do - I was born this way LOL
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ohio
Posts: 3,086
|
personally I think that the algo needs to be adjusted for adult sites and I hope in the coming months that it will be
I have been doing things to make my site better for google bot and I too am gonna look at my trades next as I have trades on my index and trades on my main page |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 247
|
Should we keep trades with categories that are listed in the supplemental index?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Certified Nice Person
|
Quote:
Here are the golden rules of link trading, which you should all live by: 1. Never trade links with any page which doesn't appear in the first five results of a site:domain.com search. 2. Avoid link trades with domains which have a poor consonant:vowel ratio. Less than 3:1 is considered a questionable ratio by Google. 3. Domains with more than two consecutive vowels are improperly discriminated against by Google. (They are working on this, but for now, you shouldn't trade links with such domains.) 4. Google hates foreigners, and music by the band Foreigner, with the exception of Hot Blooded, though I don't know how that will help. 5. Any site with any page listed as supplemental is to be avoided, EVEN IF they appear to rank very well for quality search terms. 6. Avoid trading links with sites with a lower Alexa ranking than you. 7. Always trade links with domains whose index Page Rank, when added to yours, will be a combined total of "10." (Pay very close attention to this rule and verify the consistency of your trades' PR weekly.)
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 247
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Certified Nice Person
|
You should know that Google doesn't really like the song Hot Blooded.
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
What can I do - I was born this way LOL
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ohio
Posts: 3,086
|
Quote:
pornhitzman if you think my LL is a risk to your site, pull my links and that we be fine |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 247
|
I think that google has made a mistake with your site and you'll probably get things back to normal after the next update.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,914
|
And so we all slip further down the slippery slope of FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt).
Instead of cooperating to create the kind of linking that google is rewarding right now, we try to cut each other's throats in a vain attempt to save ourselves and be the last one standing, without even trying to understand what is actually happening. This is what the betrayal of linking trust leads to. When we most need each other, to create unique anchor text, to give each other one-way links, trusting that our partners will fairly give us one way links in return, and keep those links up no matter what happens, we betray each other. Instead of working on creating more unique and original content, structured the way google's algos now reward, we start an inquisition that takes us nowhere, based on bad information, bad models, and suspicion. Oh yeah, that's real smart. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|