New free site format (version 1.5)

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by kit

...And for sure I do not "push" left side recips template, just because it will spidered first. If you know DOM, bloсk position in the browser window and position in html code can be totally different...

I don't know what DOM is, but I do know that 99.44% of people that create an html page like the gif example you posted would have whatever is in that left hand cell seen 1st by a spider.

Originally Posted by kit

...So, I think all of the following sites broke this rule.
http://www.link-o-rama.com/greenguy/blog_porn.htm
http://www.link-o-rama.com/galleries/

So, why don't allow FS be more flexible in their format?...

That's what you come back at me with after 5 days of debating? My blog category links to blog pages & my hosted gallery page (that's not open to submits) links to hosted galleries? You forgot all of those pesky surfer-annoying paysites that I have listed.

We're talking about Free Sites in regards to Link Lists - not blogs or gallery pages or pic posts or rate my ass or top lists or avs sites or pay sites or access with email sites or tube sites or sex toy stores or dating sites or online dvd stores or phone sex page or adult message board or webmaster resource site or anything else that my Link List may or may not link to that is not a Free Site.

You know, I was thinking: if you're that concerned with getting the surfers to the content quicker, you could just link to the gallery pages. Or the pics/vids themselves - that's an even better idea! Think of the surfer retention you have then!

PS - the C letter is this: c Not this: с

[kit]

Originally Posted by Greenie

You know, I was thinking: if you're that concerned with getting the surfers to the content quicker, you could just link to the gallery pages.

I concerning about ballance betwwen FS usabilty and value.
Last 5 years this ballance decreased and became very small.

Originally Posted by Greenie

Or the pics/vids themselves - that's an even better idea! Think of the surfer retention you have then!

This is Tube conception. Yeach page IS content (streaming video).
http://www.youporn.com got 5 million uniques daily using it. Not bad.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by kit

...This is Tube conception. Yeach page IS content (streaming video).
http://www.youporn.com got 5 million uniques daily using it. Not bad.

No - I'm talking about hotlinking or linking to directories of pics that have no index file or linking directly to pics/vids on sites that have no htaccess file in place.

Now THAT would make for a happy surfing experience.

Or why not just endorse good old Fusker?

[kit]

Originally Posted by Greenie

No - I'm talking about hotlinking or linking to directories of pics that have no index file or linking directly to pics/vids on sites that have no htaccess file in place.
Now THAT would make for a happy surfing experience.

The ballance between free side and monetary side of the business must be.

Tubes on the right side (each page is a video which streams in your browser), we're on left side (small, unuseful sites with bad topology). And TGP in the center. ;-)

We can stay on the left side, but surfers constantly migrate to the right side. Now when SE positions dropped, LL traffic will almost dry.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by kit

...Now when SE positions dropped, LL traffic will almost dry.

So your site would die if Google dropped you to the point where you could not find your domain on the 1st few pages of results for ANY keyword(s)?