|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Screw you, guys. I'm going home.
|
Unless you have some kind of arragement with LL owner - NO
You are breaking to many rules to have your sites listed on a standard LL - subdomains - to many outgooing links - some reviewers may not like banners that look like clickable thumbs http://sites.pornisation.com/4_incre...ocks/main.html And why the hell you need 4 galleries? From what I've seen those sites with 4-6 galleries are always in gay niche ![]() --------- edit Ahhh, Fonz replied quicker.. again ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 15
|
I've always tried to speak out about using less content, I dont like giving away too much. But in the gay market, you can pretty much get whole paysites for free now. There are so much content and affiliates uses HUGE amount of content in whatever way they promote sites. So if you want to compete you got to at least have a certain Minimum.
For example these free sites I showed here mostly have 36-48 pictures, this means that some larger gay link lists wont list them, not enough content! Which is why I only list them on my own sites to provide my traffic with clean galleries, and on Manpics200. Gaydemon, Manpics2000 and Hunkhunter I belive is the only Gay link lists with a higher amount of traffic. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 15
|
What If I offered two versions of site in terms or URL:
http://www.pornisation.com/4_incredible_amateur_cocks/ http://sites.pornisation.com/4_incre...amateur_cocks/ I guess I could always put a robot.txt file in the www telling it not to spider or index those pages. Seems silly though because they way ive designed these would mean there might be some PR on them at some point, but not on the www. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|