how overused is this content? [little april]

[SmithsMedia]

Originally posted by jennym
Hi Neticule,

First of all....love the sig!! Being a parent, I can totally relate.

On the question of the content. I don't get a lot of sites submitted with that content, so I haven't seen any over-saturation of it. That said, I don't list her galleries anyway. It is just one of those things for me. She looks VERY young, and has always been promoted that way.

But, good luck with your sites.

I sse your point ansd its why I choose some regukar content. I remember some time ago when 'Teen Kelly' hit the web and the same debates went on.

Personally I chose not to promote LA for some time though after reading the sales ratios etc I made a COMMERCIAL desicision to start promoting this site.

Has it worked for me? We to be frank yes, it still converts 1/63 for me now as a small webmaster thats revenue I have to welcome with open arms.

Im not into them making her appear really fucking young however it does clearly state shes over 18. I have to raise the point of 'dressing people to make em look younger/different' its massive in the fetish niche. Grown adults dressing as school kinds and babies etc.

Weather I like it or not this site sells, OK so it dont rebill but it does sell. LA is nothing new theres a 100 sites just like hers some are even worse for making the 'young' statement youngporn springs to mind.

LA is teen lesbian site nothing more nothing less, the models are compliant and over 18, it dont look like my free siute is getting listed any how, which kind of sucks but thats life