Is this gallery butt-ugly? :)

HowlingWulf · 2006-12-22, 12:15 PM

I'd say incredibly ugly. Pics should be cropped and not squished. Lots of white space on either side. Design for a width of 700 to 800, which means make the thumbs bigger and/or have 3 rows instead of 4. No sales text as mentioned. Also, the images are watermarked (c) 'Anal in the Amazon' but I don't see any link promoting a site like that. Finally, a sextracker counter on a gallery counts against you on many sites.

The best thing would be to surf some top linklist/tgp sites and browse. The top spots have some great designs.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2006-12-22, 12:15 PM	#5
HowlingWulf Me fail English? That's unpossible! Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: FL Posts: 1,381	I'd say incredibly ugly. Pics should be cropped and not squished. Lots of white space on either side. Design for a width of 700 to 800, which means make the thumbs bigger and/or have 3 rows instead of 4. No sales text as mentioned. Also, the images are watermarked (c) 'Anal in the Amazon' but I don't see any link promoting a site like that. Finally, a sextracker counter on a gallery counts against you on many sites. The best thing would be to surf some top linklist/tgp sites and browse. The top spots have some great designs.