Do we, as an adult webmaster community, oppose supporting adult versions of YouTube?

[ClickBuster]

Fuck I lost the message by clicking on the back button by mistake. So again...

IMHO in 90% of the time there're 3 types of buyers:

1. Noobs - that have no previous buying experience
2. Savvy buyers - looking for serious support of the product they're buying
3. Dedicated surfers - these're the people bookmarking your sites

The last 2 types are what I'd refer to as quality traffic and both of them require content quality, not quantity.

Buyers are not interested in free porn. They need sources to find what's worth watching and what's not. They hold account of the time they spend looking for quality, which is why they usually stick to using a bunch of selected and verified sources, instead of browsing tons of free galleries.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, I certainly don't think that I know everything and I would greatly appreciate any correction if required.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by Tommy

I am not missing the point. I really think you are

you don't like it cause it might cost you some money

the company's that sold pay phones said the same thing about cell phones they were wrong then and you are wrong now

millions of companies or people have been put out of work because of progress should we have banned computers back in the 70s or ban robots today

just cause I make my living from a link list doesn't mean I am gonna turn myself into a hypocrite

so basically your argument is
my free porn is OK but theirs isn't cause I make less money

No, for the love of I'm saying that I don't SUPPORT it. While I understand it & I see how it could be valuable to some people, that does not mean that I have to support it.

Based on all the examples you're posted, do you think that the companies that had the old technology helped/supported the new technology?

If you want to support it, go nuts. When someone figures out how to attach an affiliate program to it (and they will) make sure you sign up & put a big banner on the index & main pages of your site. Here's the text you can use under it:
Don't bother surfing these free sites & galleries! Click Here for all the free porn movies you can handle! And then delete all your bookmarks, including this one, because my site sucks compared to the free movies you'll get at Free-Video-Site

[Tommy]

My site dont suck

in fact i have always thought its like the best out there

nobody puts up more movie links in a day then I do
http://www.tommys-bookmarks.com/movie.shtml

just scroll through the new section

in fact i bet you could lump a bunch of LLs or tgps together and I would still be putting up more movie links

[Jim]

Tommy, what is the maximum length of a movie clip you will accept? I think that is the biggest difference. You can have a ton of movies as long as they are short enough to make a surfer want more.

[ClickBuster]

LOL!

I'm from Bulgaria, a country from the Ex-Soviet Block. I haven't lived enough under communism to argue about it, but I do know that this thread reminds me a lot about it.

[plateman]

it dont take much to see if those sites grow and spawn new sites that it's gonna kill us affiliates

its bad enough we gotta post free porn to generate traffic

now we have to compete with a tube site that has people giving away more porn for the hell of it...

ratios are bad enough anymore, and if you do find a good site that converts good it don't last its getting harder and harder to see sales anymore

how would a big traffic site like tommys and the hun would "like" to loose half there traffic cause those tube sites have grown and spawned and have clips 8 to 15 min long....those tube sites would have some serious hosting bill but they would have tons of traffic to sell spots and have ads to and rake in the bucks for the owners

then all of the 1000s of people like us suffer with worse ratios and lower traffic cause we cant compete with them

also you could say those tube site surfers are freeloaders??

how many surfers come to our sites and say to themselfs "today I am gonna join a site" hardly any but a good site sells the surfer a membership

those tube sites are just another way to loose sales and traffic to the big money people that put those sites up!!! you think the guys that put up youtube and porntube were poor, they had money and backing imo

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by Tommy

...nobody puts up more movie links in a day then I do
http://www.tommys-bookmarks.com/movie.shtml...

You're sorta helping to prove my point You income model is linking to your own galleries/free sites as well as those of other webmasters. How does that fit into what I think we will now refer to as "tube sites"?

(and your site doesn't suck - I tell friends to go there instead if mine )

[Kinky]

I voted yes, I support porn, competition or not, the only porn I would ever not support involves underage stuff...

all they are doing is giving away better free porn than we are via a different business model, it might piss you off but that is what they are doing.

it's already been concluded that they have a right to exist, so as an adult webmaster community should we only support our own exact way of adult webmastering, and only when we don't think it will harm our bank accounts?

full file sharing among surfers isn't new by any means, it is just getting easier for them to share their collections now, and better some tube sites run by people in the industry than P2P sharing that is spreading viruses and malware all over the world and underground file sharing sites where all the illegal stuff gets mixed in with all of our legal stuff and BAM! the adult industry is a bunch of dirty CP pushing scumbags... it doesn't matter where the porn comes from, it matters where it ends up because we get the blame for all of it and any outlet that can be policed by the industry is a good one IMO

[Maj. Stress]

I think if an adult tube type site got as popular as "you tube", it could draw more negative publicity to our industry. Then we have congressmen trying to pass new laws and it all ends up in the courts again. This industry has more than it's share of legal battles. No need to throw gas on the fire.

[Toby]

It's the surfer upload part that I have issue with. Regardless of whether the site is "controlled" by "people in the industry" or not. Due to the sheer numbers there is simply no way to effectively police all of that content.

[Kinky]

so we should openly ridicule everybody involved with tube porn on GG&Jim then??? just because they have a different business model?

this isn't about whether you like/dislike tube sites, it's about running off people who came to this community looking for help...

one person asked about a script for sharing, you could do alot of cool things with a script like that and who knows wtf they were gonna do with it, and why shouldn't they be able to find a script?

somebody asked about advertising for a tube site, and XXXJay posted here because he probably knows that this isn't just a LL/TGP board and that some people here who own/run programs and sites might want a different source of traffic...

which part of that should they be run off for, what am I missing? feel free to hate tube sites into the ground if you want but why hate on the people just for being associated with them in some way, shape, or form, hell even just asking about them? I hate "porn blogs" to no end but I don't treat people that blog, or in this industry make what i call "lie logs" to attract surfers...

I guess maybe GG needs to elaborate on what he means by support, send them free traffic and links, no, treat people who like or use them bad simply for that fact, well I vote no to that too....

[DangerDave]

As long as there is lots of gagging and abuse.... I am all for it! |

DD

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Kinky Jones

it's already been concluded that they have a right to exist, so as an adult webmaster community should we only support our own exact way of adult webmastering, and only when we don't think it will harm our bank accounts?

Well, yes. This isn't a chamber of commerce.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by Maj. Stress

I think if an adult tube type site got as popular as "you tube", it could draw more negative publicity to our industry...

Not that it's an accurate gauge, but go look at pornotube.com on Alexa - it's already very popular.

Originally Posted by Toby

It's the surfer upload part that I have issue with. Regardless of whether the site is "controlled" by "people in the industry" or not. Due to the sheer numbers there is simply no way to effectively police all of that content.

That's their problem (and hopefully the police it enough so that they don't get sued)

Originally Posted by Kinky Jones

...I guess maybe GG needs to elaborate on what he means by support, send them free traffic and links, no, treat people who like or use them bad simply for that fact, well I vote no to that too....

After I read you're 1st post, I realized that "support" has more than one meaning.

Of course I support their right to do it, but I will not support them by helping to find scripts or ads or programs that might want to use it.

Why would I (and 75% of the board members that voted) want to help/assist a concept that would negatively effect our current business models?

[GonZo]

Originally Posted by Tommy

you guys are a bunch of hypocrytes

I have seen so many webmasters defend porn by claiming free speech but now that their income could be threatened free speech doesn't matter so much

to much free porn is no good for the business but of course those very same webmasters are putting porn on the web for free.
but of course they are putting out just the right amount of free porn, so its ok


ohh and lets not forget the copyright BS
that's like telling Ford they cant build cars cause some of them might be used as get away cars to rob banks

you would starve technical innovation and progress because somebody might violate a copyright. what if they said that about the Internet as whole back in 1995

99.9 percent of adult content owners never bother to file any copyrights

Amen brother.

[Toby]

Originally Posted by Tommy

99.9 percent of adult content owners never bother to file any copyrights

You don't have to file in order to have copyright. All original work is copyrighted at the time of it's creation. The only thing to gain by filing is that you're in a much better position to prove the work is yours should you actually go to court, and you're also eligible for treble damages.

[Jim]

Gonzo
I have to admit, out of most of them, pornotube seems to be doing it right. There seems to less than 40 second video clips vs the 10 min clips I saw yesterday on lesser "tube" sites.

I did just see some 1.5 min clips. But still, way short of the 10 min clips from yesterday. And, I have not found anything other than sponsor content. Of course there are way too many clips to look at them all.

[GonZo]

Originally Posted by Jim

Gonzo
I have to admit, out of most of them, pornotube seems to be doing it right. There seems to less than 40 second video clips vs the 10 min clips I saw yesterday on lesser "tube" sites.

I did just see some 1.5 min clips. But still, way short of the 10 min clips from yesterday. And, I have not found anything other than sponsor content. Of course there are way too many clips to look at them all.

Pornotube is a very powerful tool for those that want to learn how to use it properly. If your a site / program owner I encourage you to contact your AEBN rep to find out how they can put it to work for you.

I know there was a plan to eliminate all the long video clips and stolen content.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by GonZo

Pornotube is a very powerful tool for those that want to learn how to use it properly. If your a site / program owner I encourage you to contact your AEBN rep to find out how they can put it to work for you...

Great. Thanks a lot. Thanks for posting the ONE FUCKING THING I WAS TRYING TO AVOID DOING ON THE BOARD.

[spazlabz]

Here is an idea that maybe we should consider trying before condemning this type of marketing outright.

Would any of you be interested in using a clone of this type of thing if it was a hosted one by your sponsor? Lets say with advertisements all over the pages for the various sites the sponsor has and all with your link code automatically in every link.

This way the viral video thing is there but it is all hosted, you just direct your traffic there and the sponsors would be responsible for the duration of the clips and how each is pushed.


spaz

[Useless]

Originally Posted by spazlabz

Would any of you be interested in using a clone of this type of thing if it was a hosted one by your sponsor? Lets say with advertisements all over the pages for the various sites the sponsor has and all with your link code automatically in every link.

Not at all.

I don't intend on sending surfers to any SINGLE page where they can be easily fed all the free movies they need.

Here's the gauntlet - slip it on. I challenge all sponsors who think tube sites are a good marketing concept to create your own such clone. Pack it full of your movie clips. I don't care if they're 15 seconds or 150 seconds. Push your traffic to that for a few months and watch your ROI drop. Go for it! What you'll discover is that surfers sit there from 10-60 minutes at a time. And you'll see a much lower click-thru ratio than that of TGP galleries or free sites. Much, much lower. (Just don't ask me to help you with bandwidth bill.) If you're still willing to ask affiliates to send traffic to it AFTER your own in-house tests, I'll assume you have great big balls simply packed full of crazy juice.

Also, make sure you hire the same non-English speaking designers to create your ads as you do on your hosted galleries.

[Toby]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

Not at all.

I don't intend on sending surfers to any SINGLE page where they can be easily fed all the free movies they need.

Here's the gauntlet - slip it on. I challenge all sponsors who think tube sites are a good marketing concept to create your own such clone. Pack it full of your movie clips. I don't care if they're 15 seconds or 150 seconds. Push your traffic to that for a few months and watch your ROI drop. Go for it! What you'll discover is that surfers sit there from 10-60 minutes at a time. And you'll see a much lower click-thru ratio than that of TGP galleries or free sites. Much, much lower. (Just don't ask me to help you with bandwidth bill.) If you're still willing to ask affiliates to send traffic to it AFTER your own in-house tests, I'll assume you have great big balls simply packed full of crazy juice.

Also, make sure you hire the same non-English speaking designers to create your ads as you do on your hosted galleries.

|gabbo| |gabbo| |gabbo| |gabbo| |halfgabbo

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by spazlabz

Here is an idea that maybe we should consider trying before condemning this type of marketing outright....

That's still teaching the surfer how to find a boatload of free movies.

***

Good post Useless

[spazlabz]

Originally Posted by Greenie

That's still teaching the surfer how to find a boatload of free movies.

***

Good post Useless

That wasn't a good post from useless, it was shit. There I said it. I floated an idea, did it have merit or not? Near as I can tell it gave useless the chance to be what he is.

Allow me to quote my own post if I may

Would any of you be interested in using a clone of this type of thing if it was a hosted one by your sponsor? Lets say with advertisements all over the pages for the various sites the sponsor has and all with your link code automatically in every link.

and pay special attention to the words I prefaced the idea with

Would any of you be interested in

it required a yes or no and maybe a bit of an explanation as to why it would be something some would or would not be interested in.

You know, I come here and try to get business done and have since GG&J kicked open its door and I have been proud of my participation in many very high quality threads. But seriously Useless Warriors constant sarcasm and shitty remarks has just worn me down to the point where I just don't have any fucking time for his silliness any longer.

spaz

[spazlabz]

Originally Posted by Greenie

That's still teaching the surfer how to find a boatload of free movies.

***

Good post Useless

cool one point i failed to point out in my last post. exactly how it is different then an MGP, Blog or any other marketing technique we use collectively. It seems that it is another way to put sales text in front of the eyes of traffic. How many free movie clips are on link-o-rama?

i guarantee there is more on your site alone then 8 clips from every single one of the 14 sites we have... well maybe not Virgin Films because that site has a pretty impressive number of videos but STILL. I am talking about another way for affiliates to diversify how they work their traffic and my understanding is there are very few who can marry one method and make really good money in it.

so please tell me how a sponsor hosted tube clone is any worse then LL, MGPs, TGPs or any other method that gives away free content.


spaz