First 2257 Offender goes to prison...

GunnCat · 2005-06-04, 05:26 AM

They threw 2257 into this so when the government starts going after webmasters, they can say they have already prosecuted 1 child pornographer under the new 2257 regulations.

Useless · 2005-06-04, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GunnCat

... they can say they have already prosecuted 1 child pornographer under the new 2257 regulations.

No, they can say they prosecuted someone under the old 2257 regs. The updated version isn't in use yet. We still have a couple of weeks.

GunnCat · 2005-06-04, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

No, they can say they prosecuted someone under the old 2257 regs. The updated version isn't in use yet. We still have a couple of weeks.

I understand UW, but to John Q. Public that distinction will likely be lossed.

spiceman45 · 2005-06-04, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GunnCat

They threw 2257 into this so when the government starts going after webmasters, they can say they have already prosecuted 1 child pornographer under the new 2257 regulations.

How right you are. This guy was hanging fruit easy to nab and will be used as an example even though it is 2256 that he falls under.

Btw this asswipe need to be in jail.

2005-06-04, 05:26 AM	#1
GunnCat You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 547	They threw 2257 into this so when the government starts going after webmasters, they can say they have already prosecuted 1 child pornographer under the new 2257 regulations.