Liability?

[Mr. Blue]

Well, you miss the point that it's been happening for over a year already. There hasn't been an incident. It is a matter of who's also doing it because they're the same ones supply the free content sponsors are using.

Model ID's have been readily handed out for over a year already...nothing has happened...2257 sucks all around, but that doesn't change the fact that it's the law and these id's have already been tossed around to thousands of people without incident.

[ArtWilliams]

Handing out the IDs in Canada, without the expressed WRITTEN consent of the model, would break out federal privacy laws. I am not a lawyer but I know that much.

I am sure that individual states would have similar legislation thereby putting affiliates in the nasty situation of having to choose between State and Federal law.

It is terrible that these women's safety is in jeopardy. Next comes the ladies who do cams from their bedrooms and have to put home addresses on their sites. Sadly, the DOJ cares little about these "cyberwhores".

--art

[emmanuelle]

Originally Posted by artwilliams

Handing out the IDs in Canada, without the expressed WRITTEN consent of the model, would break out federal privacy laws. I am not a lawyer but I know that much.

I am sure that individual states would have similar legislation thereby putting affiliates in the nasty situation of having to choose between State and Federal law.

It is terrible that these women's safety is in jeopardy. Next comes the ladies who do cams from their bedrooms and have to put home addresses on their sites. Sadly, the DOJ cares little about these "cyberwhores".

--art

I think that some people might be a little more sensitive to the issue if a loved one were a performer. Unfortunately, models are often considered to be at the bottom of the food chain in this industry.