Pulling Free Sites Because Of 2257? Post The Info Here

sue-fl · 2005-06-16, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay

Jays XXX is not pulling anything.

Get yourself a lawyer and talk to him to see how 2257 really applies to you. This is something 95% of you guys haven't done and there are about 10 guys in the US that I feel are qualified to talk about this. Email me jay@occash.com and I will be happy to give you their names and numbers.

Geez Jay I'm make free sites and submit them. Just now getting into link list area. I can't afford a lawyer I don't make enough at this (yet) to be able to do that. So deleting my old sites that don't get traffic any more makes more sense to me than paying for a lawyer. I don't think this new 2257 is going to pass, so I can just rebuild them.

Linkster · 2005-06-16, 10:34 PM

Sue - I would say that is a very good approach - Ive got sites out there that I havent even looked at in 5 years - let alone know which defunct sponsor they go to

The important thing for everyone to keep in mind is that - if it was making you money - keep it simple to get back online - heck most big LLs out there not only are going to let you submit them again and get on the "new sites" page again - but they would have pulled them after 6 months anyway - so really no loss - and plenty of room for gain

Jay - keep in mind that 95% of the people that read your posts dont make in a year what you and others here make in a two week pay period - and even the ones of us that do have opted to save our money - play it safe - get the same legal advice that all 10 of those lawyers are giving - and when the fear,gloom and doom and the black skys have cleared - everything will be back to normal and we can just ride off into the sunset of life

Damn - now where did I put that scotch bottle

RedCow · 2005-06-17, 03:10 PM

Hi,

I was wondering what the best way to remove sites is.

1: just remove index.html, which will result in redirecting (because of htaccess) to my main page (hub without pop-ups).

2: replace index.html with a new site saying something like: closed because of 2257 and then a link to my main page.

3: ???

Which one will be preferred by most LL’s?

Thanks,
RedCow

Useless · 2005-06-17, 03:34 PM

If you must remove sites, I PREFER that you 404 or 302 to a page plain page that states the site/page has been removed with a link to where you'd like the surfer to proceed to. That's my perfect world scenario. My true preference would be that you just wait a little longer and see how the injunction and proceeding court case(s) pan out.

RedCow · 2005-06-17, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

My true preference would be that you just wait a little longer and see how the injunction and proceeding court case(s) pan out.

Of course I will keep as many sites online as possible but according to most of my sponsors I have to remove their free content

I guess it’s better to buy my own stuff in the future then…

lassiter · 2005-06-18, 11:16 AM

I'll be pulling the following sites with now-disallowed Topbucks content

early this coming week:

http://www.pussiporn.com/big-tits/

http://www.pussiporn.com/pie01/

http://www.neep-neep.com/asian01/

Links to all mirror entry pages associated with the above directories can be removed anytime.

Thanks!

2005-06-16, 10:34 PM	#2
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	Sue - I would say that is a very good approach - Ive got sites out there that I havent even looked at in 5 years - let alone know which defunct sponsor they go to The important thing for everyone to keep in mind is that - if it was making you money - keep it simple to get back online - heck most big LLs out there not only are going to let you submit them again and get on the "new sites" page again - but they would have pulled them after 6 months anyway - so really no loss - and plenty of room for gain Jay - keep in mind that 95% of the people that read your posts dont make in a year what you and others here make in a two week pay period - and even the ones of us that do have opted to save our money - play it safe - get the same legal advice that all 10 of those lawyers are giving - and when the fear,gloom and doom and the black skys have cleared - everything will be back to normal and we can just ride off into the sunset of life Damn - now where did I put that scotch bottle __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2005-06-17, 03:10 PM	#3
RedCow If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Denmark Posts: 34	Hi, I was wondering what the best way to remove sites is. 1: just remove index.html, which will result in redirecting (because of htaccess) to my main page (hub without pop-ups). 2: replace index.html with a new site saying something like: closed because of 2257 and then a link to my main page. 3: ??? Which one will be preferred by most LL’s? Thanks, RedCow __________________ RedCow's Webmaster Area - Hardlink Trades, Traffic Trades, Sponsors and a lot more...

2005-06-17, 03:34 PM	#4
Useless Certified Nice Person Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Dirty Undies, NY Posts: 11,268	If you must remove sites, I PREFER that you 404 or 302 to a page plain page that states the site/page has been removed with a link to where you'd like the surfer to proceed to. That's my perfect world scenario. My true preference would be that you just wait a little longer and see how the injunction and proceeding court case(s) pan out. __________________ Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling.

2005-06-18, 11:16 AM	#6
lassiter I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman! Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 473	I'll be pulling the following sites with now-disallowed Topbucks content early this coming week: http://www.pussiporn.com/big-tits/ http://www.pussiporn.com/pie01/ http://www.neep-neep.com/asian01/ Links to all mirror entry pages associated with the above directories can be removed anytime. Thanks!