3 link rule?

smutranger · 2005-07-16, 01:28 AM

I've always put the 2257 link at the bottom but never made it an active link. If they want to check 2257 info, then they'll have to cut and paste the url. No easy click click for them.

Osiris · 2005-07-16, 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smutranger

I've always put the 2257 link at the bottom but never made it an active link. If they want to check 2257 info, then they'll have to cut and paste the url. No easy click click for them.

Hmmm, I might do that if it means I can still have 3 sponsor links, even though I usually only put 2, plus the 2257.

BTW, nice site! I'm submitting a blog right now!

docholly · 2005-07-16, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osiris

Hmmm, I might do that if it means I can still have 3 sponsor links, even though I usually only put 2, plus the 2257.

Since you only put 2 could you use the 3rd one to link to one of my hubs?

Cleo · 2005-07-16, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smutranger

I've always put the 2257 link at the bottom but never made it an active link. If they want to check 2257 info, then they'll have to cut and paste the url. No easy click click for them.

I do the same thing. I don't really want people going to my 2257 page. It is there because I've been told to put it there, but that is it.

No I don't count the 2257 link when I'm reviewing unless it has ads on it.

tickler · 2005-07-16, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cleo

I do the same thing. I don't really want people going to my 2257 page. It is there because I've been told to put it there, but that is it.

No I don't count the 2257 link when I'm reviewing unless it has ads on it.

I just use a text link on free sites and galleries also. On the roots and main pages, I do have a clickable link. Mind you as a non-US WM I only have the content providers listed there, and not all the current BS required.

Mainly because some TPG/MPG scripts will actually count it as a link if it is active, and penalize your page.

I really don't know why some TGP/MPG/LL owners feel that they have to be cops. I might have to start asking for their badge numbers soon.

GeorgeTH · 2005-07-17, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tickler

...I really don't know why some TGP/MPG/LL owners feel that they have to be cops. I might have to start asking for their badge numbers soon.

My thinking, too!

Plus: how many of the thumbnailed TGPs are actually 2257 compliant? Not many I'm submitting to... (BTW: I like it this way - I believe 2257 is another hype which will go away! I have seen so many rules come and go over the years...)

Osiris · 2005-07-18, 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeorgeTH

My thinking, too!

Plus: how many of the thumbnailed TGPs are actually 2257 compliant? Not many I'm submitting to... (BTW: I like it this way - I believe 2257 is another hype which will go away! I have seen so many rules come and go over the years...)

I hope it's all hype, but I have a feeling that with the current government it will not be.

Greenguy · 2005-07-18, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cleo

...No I don't count the 2257 link when I'm reviewing unless it has ads on it.

Same thing here

ardentgent · 2005-07-17, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smutranger

I've always put the 2257 link at the bottom but never made it an active link. If they want to check 2257 info, then they'll have to cut and paste the url. No easy click click for them.

I believe the rule requires an active link. This is becoming a problem. Some sites are getting rejected because there are too many links. I have found scripts rejecting some of my gallery submissions for not having a link to 2257 information. I think that this is going to cut down on the number of galleries linking to the sponsor to promote it to other webmasters as well.

Osiris · 2005-07-17, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ardentgent

I believe the rule requires an active link. This is becoming a problem. Some sites are getting rejected because there are too many links. I have found scripts rejecting some of my gallery submissions for not having a link to 2257 information. I think that this is going to cut down on the number of galleries linking to the sponsor to promote it to other webmasters as well.

Yes, that does suck. If you don't put one you're declined, if you put one you have too many links..

2005-07-16, 01:28 AM	#1
smutranger If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 38	I've always put the 2257 link at the bottom but never made it an active link. If they want to check 2257 info, then they'll have to cut and paste the url. No easy click click for them. __________________ [<a href="http://www.assesforthemasses.com">Asses for the masses</a>] [<a href="http://www.battlemilfs.com">Battle MILFs</a>] [<a href="http://www.feedmeporno.com">Feed me porno</a>]