Get listed - first site, see , say some comments

MrYum · 2006-06-08, 09:53 PM

Adding to Preacher's comments (which you'll definitely want to implement btw)...hidden whois and invisible recips will get you declined regularly.

Add a line or two of juicy text above and/or below your banners...make the surfer want to click. Just plain banners don't pull well at all anymore.

This is one of my personal peeves...not sure how other reviewers feel about it though. Sponsor links like "See blah blah on OUR site" or "Join US blah blah". To me those kinds of links imply that the paysite is under the same ownership as the site the surfer is currently on. This kinda muddies the water as to making it clear the link leads to a paysite not associated with where he is now. Again, jmo...but am curious what other reviewers think of this practice.

Back to your review

Your gallery pages on the first site could easily be wider and still fit at 800 wide (if you choose to widen em up, make sure they still fit at 800). Opening those up a bit would allow you to increase your text link size and possibly even your thumbs...and still have a nice balance on the page.

Other than those minor details...damn fine looking sites

Danny · 2006-06-08, 10:48 PM

Mighty fine =)

http://www.pornomagix.com/Hugedicksl...cks/index.html
has a few thumbs leading to the wrong pic.
If you are planning on using "huge dicks little chicks" as the site name(as the logo implies)you might run into troubles here and there, better to come up with your own.
Prehaps also link the 2257 info to the actual info.

Other than that and previous posts

2006-06-08, 09:53 PM	#1
MrYum Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs! Join Date: May 2004 Location: Sunny Florida! Posts: 5,108	Adding to Preacher's comments (which you'll definitely want to implement btw)...hidden whois and invisible recips will get you declined regularly. Add a line or two of juicy text above and/or below your banners...make the surfer want to click. Just plain banners don't pull well at all anymore. This is one of my personal peeves...not sure how other reviewers feel about it though. Sponsor links like "See blah blah on OUR site" or "Join US blah blah". To me those kinds of links imply that the paysite is under the same ownership as the site the surfer is currently on. This kinda muddies the water as to making it clear the link leads to a paysite not associated with where he is now. Again, jmo...but am curious what other reviewers think of this practice. Back to your review Your gallery pages on the first site could easily be wider and still fit at 800 wide (if you choose to widen em up, make sure they still fit at 800). Opening those up a bit would allow you to increase your text link size and possibly even your thumbs...and still have a nice balance on the page. Other than those minor details...damn fine looking sites __________________ Porno Flixxx Submissions SOTI Site Submissions Free Porn Resource Submissions

2006-06-08, 10:48 PM	#2
Danny Ahhh ... sweet pity. Where would my love life be without it? Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: ISP hell... Posts: 200	Mighty fine =) http://www.pornomagix.com/Hugedicksl...cks/index.html has a few thumbs leading to the wrong pic. If you are planning on using "huge dicks little chicks" as the site name(as the logo implies)you might run into troubles here and there, better to come up with your own. Prehaps also link the 2257 info to the actual info. Other than that and previous posts __________________ Private Holes Last edited by Danny; 2006-06-08 at 10:50 PM..