Senate Proposes Prison for Those Failing to Label Adult Sites

[Useless]

Originally Posted by susanna

What is stupid is that children are looking at the pictures and not the "warning" text. They should require that the landing pages have no hardcore. If a child clicks thru to the main page, they are old enough to be making that choice...and old enough that the parents should be watching.

What is your definition of a "landing page"? All of my pages are landing pages when it comes to search engines. Should I remove all of the hardcore content from every single page? Filter tagging is simple - and if keeps kids off of my pages, I'm all for it.

Originally Posted by Grinch

Sounds like 'Big Brother' is wasting our money again, and too dumb to know the difference.

Meanwhile, you're using a character from a popular children's book as your name on an adult webmaster board. This is EXACTLY what big brother is looking for; the use of terms that could possibly draw child surfers. The type of meta tag under discussion is the kind you would get here at http://www.icra.org/ Watch out - those cocksuckers have pop-ups on their site now.