|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Internet! Is that thing still around?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Madness is like gravity. All it takes is a little... push.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,679
|
You could rotate a few in and out every so often and see what kind of traffic you get.
What's your hesitation from having a bunch? Seems to me syndication is about publication in as many places as possible. ![]()
__________________
~Warm and Fuzzy. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Wheither you think you can or you think you can't, Your right.
|
Quote:
This brings up another question, if you just have a plain rss link or default rss link, are most surfers smart enough to know how to add it to their reader, or do that need the link geared to their reader to add the feed(s)? Thanks every one for the replies, it is appreciated... ![]() ronnie Last edited by ronnie; 2006-08-03 at 11:58 AM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Wheither you think you can or you think you can't, Your right.
|
Quote:
![]() Guess the more you think about it, if the surfer has a reader other than the SE's or SE page, seems they would be smarter about how to add new feeds, they would have to be really. Where as the SE group, they might be more easy, click and do type. Here's a quick question, though a little off subject. Do SE's find rss feeds or links on their own, like harvesting links with bots? ronnie |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Madness is like gravity. All it takes is a little... push.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,679
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
~Warm and Fuzzy. ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
|
Quote:
Also, yahoo was the first of the SE's to add a reader for homepages and Google trailed way behind. Since those surveys are a little dated it could be that Google may have not really been in the game at the time. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|