Recips question

[Preacher]

I agree with both posts above.

The only thing I will add is this. I couldn't care less who a LL wants next to them in a recip table. But there are linklists out there that do not want to be listed with other certain linklists. 99% of the time those other certain linklists are corrupt and it's best to leave them off your tables all together.

If you aren't sure if a linklist is corrupt, ask here and if the name turns into a bunch of *'s it's definitely bad news.

BTW, those corrupt lists will not be on the resource link above.

Good luck.

Preacher

[virgohippy]

Originally Posted by Preacher

If you aren't sure if a linklist is corrupt, ask here and if the name turns into a bunch of *'s it's definitely bad news.

Goodie! Now I know a few sites to purge from my list!

Well... once I'm done with my silly scripting project, and actually get back to making freesites...

[MrYum]

Looks like sound advice already given

That link is a great place to start. If you find yourself needing more later, another way to find them is to follow the trades links on submit pages.

Oh, I'm another one that could care less who else in on the page. As long as they're active lists...you're good to go...and I think you'll find that's the mindset of the vast majority of link site owners

[iMan]

If you aren't sure if a linklist is corrupt, ask here and if the name turns into a bunch of *'s it's definitely bad news.

I've seen some of these cases but is that a reason enough to not submit to these link lists?
I mean, if no reason is given, is the fact that they're *ed out on this board reason enough for everyone to avoid them?

I'd just like to know WHY, that's all...

[spacemanspiff]

Originally Posted by iMan

I've seen some of these cases but is that a reason enough to not submit to these link lists?
I mean, if no reason is given, is the fact that they're *ed out on this board reason enough for everyone to avoid them?

I'd just like to know WHY, that's all...

Well, it's a really good reason to take a very close look anyway.

Consider it the "where there's smoke, there's fire" principle.

[iMan]

Well, it's a really good reason to take a very close look anyway.

Consider it the "where there's smoke, there's fire" principle.

I don't doubt that they're *ed for a very good reason...
But if one of these LLs list my sites and I get a good amount of traffic from it, what else is there to take a closer look at?

[ponygirl]

Originally Posted by iMan

I don't doubt that they're *ed for a very good reason...
But if one of these LLs list my sites and I get a good amount of traffic from it, what else is there to take a closer look at?

well, if it's because of cheating, then I won't submit no matter what. But if it's from a personality conflict or something, just be careful who you group together, that's all

I can see that's why it would be good to know why certain people get the *** treatment lol.

[spacemanspiff]

Originally Posted by iMan

I don't doubt that they're *ed for a very good reason...
But if one of these LLs list my sites and I get a good amount of traffic from it, what else is there to take a closer look at?

In that situation, absolutely nothing. If you're happy with that LL then I can't see any reason not to submit to them. I was really refferring to a LL you're not familiar with that's xxx'ed here. And I'm not saying don't submit to them, just to take a look.