The New 2257 Rulings - What now?

[bluemoney]

I think most folks in this Industry have just sat back and let the FSC take the lead. With that in mind they had no reason (until now) to challenge anything. Because;

1. They had a deal with the Feds

2. Judge Miller had not made his interim ruling (which he has as of March 30th)

They now have until the 16th of April to plead their case and my guess is the fourteenth amendment will be put in play.

But hell, I could be wrong. I’m just a whisky drinking “dipstick” with what my wife describes as a case of adult ADD. But I think she hey there’s a quarter under my chair

[Mr. Blue]

Question I have is how far will they let you redact the documentation.

Thus, primary producers may obliterate from identification documents the performers' addresses, social security numbers and all but the year from their dates of birth.

Now reading that over it sounds like you can lay waste to identification in one giant smudge of blacked out info and all but the birthdate and picture need be included. If you can exclude the models name or at least the surname...this becomes one giant case of busy work for sponsors, affiliates, etc, with no real purpose (how the fuck would heavily edited documents help anyone?), but its a doable solution, a waste of time, but still.

Okay time to contact my lawyer

[plateman]

fuck this 2257 stuff changes like ohio weather....now us secondary handlers are responsible for having docs on sponsor content?

the last news was we were not and it's been layed to rest

now here we go again....its a fuckin soap opera